LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old October 5th 06, 06:09 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 322
Default Good AM Medium Wave Receivers?

) writes:
Mike M. wrote:
Hi,
I have an old GE Superradio that works well. I purchased a CCPlus
radio that has a problem with LED readout I am told is common.
Any AM radios currently in production that are good DX machines?
Thank you.
Mike McM.


With the looming possibility of nighttime AM IBOC being approved, I
wouldn't spend too much on an AM DX "machine". I had a piece of junk
Grundig S350, but returned it for a cheapie $25 Radio Shack model
12-898 AM/FM PLL, that works just as well as the over-hyped S350. I
think all this talk about "DX machines" is just hype.

ONe of the really nice things about a digitally tuned radio is of
course it's easy to get exactly on frequency.

There are a couple of FM stations just beyond regular reception
(well one got bumped this week when a local station came on the frequency).
Having them programmed into my bedside radio (a Delco digitally tuned
car radio running off a 12v supply) means it's really easy to check
them, and hopefully receive them when they are receivable. An analog
receiver requires a lot of constant tuning to get the same thing.

Likewise, when the band is open, it's easy to put some frequencies
into the memory rather than the local stations, again to allow for
easy frequency jumping. This also applies to AM.

And of course, it's far easier to identify a station if you can
start with a known frequency, something not always the case with
a lot of analog receivers if they aren't good shortwave receivers.

"Good AM receiver" is actually a spread. Just about anything will
get some results, all one has to do is start tuning. I think
sometimes people think they need to start with something better
before they can hear any DX.

THe SUper Radio gets touted in these threads, but not only is
it analog, but it's not that much better than the average AM
radio. Car radios often are better performers.

But yes, for this level of receptiion, a digitally tuned receiver
likely is a good choice, because of that ease of tuning. If someone
doesn't actually tune up and down the band because it's too much
trouble, they'll never hear any DX.

Of course, a third level requires much better equipment, because
at that point one is struggling at a far weaker signal level, likely
with a lot of interference. That's when the bells and whistles come
in, and those sure aren't there on the Super Radio or the low end
receivers.

Michael


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Medium Wave DXing Steve Whitt Shortwave 0 April 17th 06 06:13 PM
Electromagnetic Radiation N9OGL General 31 March 1st 06 02:42 PM
physical 1/4, electrical 1/2 wavelength John Smith Antenna 59 March 31st 05 10:53 PM
F.S. Radio / Books & Stuff Brian Hill Swap 0 January 27th 05 07:00 PM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017