bpnjensen wrote:

Dan Say wrote:

CHU not newsy? The news changes every minute.

LOL!

And it only the upper frequency that is in danger.

Oh - my mistake - I thought I recalled that all three may be in
jeopardy.

Bruce Jensen

Linkname: ARRLWeb: Canada's 7.335 MHz CHU Time Signal
Could Go Silent, Shift
URL: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/11/30/100/

Linkname: NRC Short Wave Station Broadcasts (CHU) | NRC-INMS
http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/time...rtwave_broadca
sts_e.html
quote
...."In April 2007 the licence on 7.335 MHz will have to be
modified to
reflect changes on the status of the band allocation by the
International Telecommunications Union. This frequency has been
changed from "fixed service" to "broadcast". (The ITU decision
does not affect the frequencies 3.33 MHz and 14.67 MHz.) Some
alternatives a... "
[ more ]
--
-\_,-~-\___...__._._._._._._._._._._._.
For real Dxing,
see]http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~vz6g-iwt/index.html