Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Carter-k8vt wrote: Telamon wrote: Hams used to build at least some of their equipment. ...and many still do. Looked at any of the construction articles in QST lately? (like for the last 15 or 20 years) I think it should be a requirement that you built your own transmitter that passes FCC specifications to transmit. Why? And do you have *any* clue as to how complex modern transceivers are? The test equipment to verify that it "passes FCC specifications to transmit"? (Priced any spectrum analyzers lately?) Furthermore, why build just the transmitter? Why wouldn't you require them to build their receiver too? Most Hams can't fix their own equipment You say "Most hams can't fix their own equipment". So what is your point? Most modern equipment uses surface mount technology, which requires 20 year old eyes and special equipment to solder/de-solder. How many people can fix their own TVs/DVDs/VCRs? For that matter, can you fix your own modern car? Why not? You have the privelege of having a driver's license. Heck, to follow -your- logic, you should -build- your own car. and they don't understand how their antennas systems work Again, so what? Some hams are indeed engineers but plenty are mail delivery persons or plumbers or any number of non-engineering occupations that enjoy radio as a hobby. I happen to believe that is one of the strengths of ham radio. so the country can't depend on them when the chips are down. Well, there seemed to be a lot of good press and good buzz about the ham radio performance during Katrina. Maybe you should do just a little research before you tar -everyone- with the same brush. Sorry, but you come across like a ham wannabee that couldn't cut the mustard...(and just use a bag full of excuses as to why you never became a ham). Or, due to the thoughtlessness and foolishness of your statements, maybe you are just trolling. :-( 73, Carter K8VT Well, I dunno... I'm not a ham, I'm a pirate. 'We don't need no frikken license, capiche?' But I do use aged ham equipment, and I do fix my own... and often have to learn something new each time I do it. The new surface-mount stuff, I couldn't have repaired even when I DID have twenty-year old eyes because my hands were never that steady. 'Plug and play' would be nice, but I suppose one wouldn't learn much that way, other than how to prepare equipment to be shipped to the repair shop, or how to shop for replacement eqpt, should that painful necessity arise... But preferring to operate in AM mode with plate modulation, more modern equipment just can't be had at a reasonable price, so its Johnson for me, along with its periodic failures and necessary self-service. For the reason that the amateur service generates necessary equipment of direct benefit to pirate broadcasters, I would want to see the amateur service continue to survive and even flourish... but for those of us who prefer AM to sideband, us musical afficionados, well, there hasn't been much efficient ham equipment manufactured suitable for that purpose in 30-40 years. Just my own inane ramblings, as I don't really have a dog in this hunt at the present. 'Fifteen men on the dead man's chest Yo Ho Ho and a bottle of rum!' The Poet aka John Poet aka domestic terrorist aka patriot |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |