Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Meat Plow" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:15:57 -0600, Brian Hill Has Frothed: "Meat Plow" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:39:20 -0600, Brian Hill Has Frothed: "helmsman" wrote in message ... On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:32:01 -0500, He'sDoneItAgain wrote: Looks like "no-code" is finally here... http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-269012A1.pdf All the CBer's should be happy. The ham bands sound like LIDville nowadays. Have you not been listening and the most dysfunctional newsgroups on Usenet are amateur topic groups. I feel sorry for the good hams that have to put up with the ****. They should make the test to where anyone with a IQ of less than 120 can not apply. I remember listening to some pretty sharp guys on the ham bands when I was a kid. Learned a lot about propagation and antennas etc.. just listening to them. Now days you gotta dig for a good QSO. They should set a part of the hf bands for just CW operators and you can't operate unless you have a CW license and they should have a test to see if your a retarded LID and if so you get the jackoff spectrum. I mean why not? BH You ever listen to some of the licensed imbeciles on the phone portion of 80 meters? I swear to ****ing god it's like listening to a CB. -- Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004 COOSN-266-06-25794 Oh yea! Plow what the heck are you doing over here? I didn't know you were a radio buff. BH Been a licensed ham for 17 years. ![]() -- Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004 COOSN-266-06-25794 Well you old ham! BH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |