Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 2:50 am, wrote:
Hi I've been away from this group for a few years but I'm just getting back into SWLing again. Anyway, I have an Icom R71 with the Kiwa audio upgrade, a Kiwa LF-H4S 6KHz AM filter, an Icom FlL-33 6KHz filter and have performed the passband tuning mod from Don Moman's R71 performance manual. I also recently re-aligned it and fine-tuned its sensitivity so that its running sweetly. The R71 was a top performer in its day but I'm just wondering how it stacks up against newer receivers like the Icom R75, AOR7030, NRD 545 or the Drake R8B. I listen solely to Worldband broadcasts and am wondering if some of the newer receivers are any better at pulling weak stations out of the mud. I do fairly well by tuning AM stations in USB or LSB mode if strong interference is a problem. I know that sync detectors improve the audio quality but are any of these receivers significantly better than the R71 at making an AM signal intelligible in the face of strong interference or when dealing with very weak signals? I don't often listen to communications so I'm only really concerned with AM. Cheers Andy Dear Andy, Those other receivers you mention are all superior to the ICOM R71 in terms of features, usability, and, at least in the case of the R8 and, especially, the AR7030 Plus, sound quality. However, with regard to what you say you listen, I do not feel that you need to "upgrade" at all. As you say, the 'R71 was a top performer in its day and it should still perform comparably today, especially in view of the obvious care you have given to your unit. As far as pulling signals "out of the mud," virtually all good receivers, used with a proper antenna, will perform comparably. Actually, this is a good time to compare receivers as we are at the "bottom" of the sunspot cycle and it is difficult to get good long- distance reception at this time. (For example, my AR7030 Plus is now greatly outperforming my Grundig Satellit 800, both using their own Wellbrook ALA 330S antennas; when conditions are better, the sets perform comparably.) If warranted, an upgrade to your antenna system might be considered before buying another receiver. Should you still desire to buy another receiver, my own personal preference is for the AOR AR7030 Plus, suitably equipped and configured. This radio, especially with its audio output being sent to a good external speaker or a good audio system, is, in my opinion, superior to the other receivers you mention in terms of "listenability" over many hours at a time. Its circuitry is top-notch and virtually all parameters can be adjusted individually, regardless of the tuning mode. Some do not like a menu-driven system, as opposed to individual knobs and dials, but this operating scheme allows similar configuration, adjustments, features, and performance at a far lower price than, say, a radio such as the Ten-tec RX-340, to which it directly compares. The AR7030 Plus' sensitivity and selectivity are superb, and it offers one of the best synchronous detection circuits on the market. If ordered from a dealer in the UK in conjunction with AOR-UK, the radio can be factory-customized to your requirements. There is a price to be paid for all of this, of course. Any new communications receiver, comparable to your 'R71, is expensive. Only you can determine if it's worth it to you or if you would be better off saving your money and sticking with what you already own, which is, as stated, a superb receiver. Welcome back to the hobby! Best, Joe |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Potential problems with the ICOM PCR1000 re installation on a pentium IV XP System? | Shortwave | |||
Icom 706 MkII G Finals | Equipment | |||
Icom R-75 Software and RS232 Port | Shortwave | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 | Swap | |||
Icom 730 Preventative Maintenance Questions | Homebrew |