In article , "Mike"
wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
Again HD can not sound better using the same bandwidth.

Of course it can, and does. Stop thinking in analog terms. All a digital
signal needs is 1s and 0s. How much bandwidth do you think that needs?

To put it in terms that you might understand, think of it like Morse Code.
Code needs less bandwidth - and less power - but the message gets thru just
fine. Why do you suppose that is?

I'm not responsible for your lack of education on the subject. Time for
you to research and study the topic. I'm not the one with the lack of
understanding.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Mike wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message

...
Again HD can not sound better using the same bandwidth.

Of course it can, and does. Stop thinking in analog terms. All a
digital
signal needs is 1s and 0s. How much bandwidth do you think that needs?

To put it in terms that you might understand, think of it like Morse Code.
Code needs less bandwidth - and less power - but the message gets thru
just
fine. Why do you suppose that is?

Mike


Try to carry on a discussion at 5 WPM.

On Mar 6, 6:52 pm, wrote:
HD radios not selling - HD shills to the rescue !

Your graph DOES NOT show that HD radios are not selling. They have
nothing to do with sales - only google web hits. Do you even bother
to read the links before posting?

A meaningful graph would compare the number of listeners to free
broadcast (AM & FM) to XM, Sirius and HD radio. Guess what - the
curves for the last three would be all but flattened by the curve for
free broadcast (AM&FM).