Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 12:28 pm, wrote:
On Mar 7, 3:17?pm, "Steve" wrote: Getting a good signal from my neighbor's cordless phone on 905 mhz. I wonder if he QSL's? Anyway, I figure I might as well starting posting about this kind of crap if the group is going to be overrun by irrelevant HD posts. Back in the 80's and early 90's, I had a Bearcat Scanner, with an 800 MHZ converter (mounted dipole in the attic), and used to listen to cell phones, baby monitors, and cordless phones, before they went digital and moved up in frequencies. I heard four of our neighbors having affairs, some couples had baby monitors in their master bedrooms, and heard a "young thing" talking with a married man over a cell phone, threatening to tell his wife. One "young thing" was talking dirty over her cell phone, to her boyfriend on his way over, and I thought he was going to wreck his car. It was great, knowing exactly what our neighbors were fighting about - the baby monitors and cell phones had a range of at least a mile. Gotta love those "young thangs" lol. I still hear lots of things in the 800-900 mhz range on my BC245XLT. Mostly cordless phones and baby monitors, though, |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 4:02?pm, "Steve" wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 7, 3:17?pm, "Steve" wrote: Getting a good signal from my neighbor's cordless phone on 905 mhz. I wonder if he QSL's? Anyway, I figure I might as well starting posting about this kind of crap if the group is going to be overrun by irrelevant HD posts. Back in the 80's and early 90's, I had a Bearcat Scanner, with an 800 MHZ converter (mounted dipole in the attic), and used to listen to cell phones, baby monitors, and cordless phones, before they went digital and moved up in frequencies. I heard four of our neighbors having affairs, some couples had baby monitors in their master bedrooms, and heard a "young thing" talking with a married man over a cell phone, threatening to tell his wife. One "young thing" was talking dirty over her cell phone, to her boyfriend on his way over, and I thought he was going to wreck his car. It was great, knowing exactly what our neighbors were fighting about - the baby monitors and cell phones had a range of at least a mile. Gotta love those "young thangs" lol. I still hear lots of things in the 800-900 mhz range on my BC245XLT. Mostly cordless phones and baby monitors, though,- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I tried my scanner recently and it was totally dark. I thought most cordless phones and baby monitors now were digital, with spread- spectrum, or some form of scrambling/encryption ? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 1:40 pm, wrote:
On Mar 7, 4:02?pm, "Steve" wrote: On Mar 7, 12:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 7, 3:17?pm, "Steve" wrote: Getting a good signal from my neighbor's cordless phone on 905 mhz. I wonder if he QSL's? Anyway, I figure I might as well starting posting about this kind of crap if the group is going to be overrun by irrelevant HD posts. Back in the 80's and early 90's, I had a Bearcat Scanner, with an 800 MHZ converter (mounted dipole in the attic), and used to listen to cell phones, baby monitors, and cordless phones, before they went digital and moved up in frequencies. I heard four of our neighbors having affairs, some couples had baby monitors in their master bedrooms, and heard a "young thing" talking with a married man over a cell phone, threatening to tell his wife. One "young thing" was talking dirty over her cell phone, to her boyfriend on his way over, and I thought he was going to wreck his car. It was great, knowing exactly what our neighbors were fighting about - the baby monitors and cell phones had a range of at least a mile. Gotta love those "young thangs" lol. I still hear lots of things in the 800-900 mhz range on my BC245XLT. Mostly cordless phones and baby monitors, though,- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I tried my scanner recently and it was totally dark. I thought most cordless phones and baby monitors now were digital, with spread- spectrum, or some form of scrambling/encryption ?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The ones sold now do use much higher frequences, but many of the old phones are still in service. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
cordless phone | Scanner | |||
Cordless Phone reception | Scanner | |||
Cordless Phone Freqs. | Scanner | |||
Is this cordless phone legal in US? | Scanner | |||
cordless phone 48 to 48.350 in .025 steps | Scanner |