Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:50:58 GMT, Ron Hardin
wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: You're not going to extend your runtime near as much as you might think. If you had an UPS with a clean enough pseudo-sine waveform to even get the next one in line to power up stably (and you have to get into some very very good ones to do that, they basically have to be generator rated), then you have to deal with the issue of the other UPS'es in the chain not being 100% efficient, so you lose a lot of what you would have gotten from that first unit in the line. This of course follows up the chain. Doesn't the UPS just pass along the input to the output as long as it's ok power? So I don't see the loss. The second UPS just passes along the output of the first UPS. That's more of a battery backup than a real UPS. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: GE Pro Series: 6M | Swap | |||
FA : TEN TEC Series 307 Series External Speaker | Swap | |||
!3.8 V DC in series. | Antenna | |||
WTB: RCA 77 Or 44 Series Mic | Swap | |||
World Series on SW? | Shortwave |