Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message ... "SWL-2010" ) writes: I havn't had time to sit down and tune it much yet, but so far so good. I can't detect any drift to amount to anything. The sound is great. The two tone controls make it rich, or flat, any way you want it. And so far, like my older S350, the sensitivity is very good. I've used my S350 a great deal, so I thought I would get the newer verision since the price was right at only a hundred bucks. What some people forget is what it was like to have a low end receiver forty years or so ago. I bought a Hallicrafter's S120A (as I've mentioned before, it was a solid state receiver) in the summer of 1971, and paid something like $80, maybe a bit more, here in Canada. It was about the cheapest new receiver I could buy, and it was barely within my price range. It got the really strong signals, and not much else. It overloaded badly, it seemed to be from FM broadcast stations or maybe TV. The BFO was so weak that it wasn't useable for receiving SSB. The dial had all kinds of exotic locations listed on it, but not only was the calibration way off, but frequency readout was like "it's closer to the .5 than the .0 mark". It had horrible backlash on the tuning knob. It was awful. I claim it was the world's worst shortwave receiver, but I suspect it wasn't that different from many of the low end solid state receivers from the period, before real advancements had been made in making good solid state shortwave receivers. We suffered through them because we couldn't afford anything better. I imagine a $20 shortwave portable from Radio Shack today couldn't be worse than that old Hallicrafter's. Plus, you'd get a digital readout, and likely the tuning knob (if it wasn't tuned by up/down buttons) would have less backlash than that first receiver of mine. That doesn't mean that relative to better receivers of today the low end are perfect, merely that they can't be worse, and may be better for the simple reason that design has changed. Michael Well, I've been buying radios and other electronic toys for many years now, and I never expect anymore than I pay for. I am rarely dissapointed, and often times pleasantly surprised. If I buy a hundred dollar radio, I pretty much know what to expect. However, with the Grundigs, I get some pretty good radios for that price range. I bought a 29 dollar Grundig last month and have had a ball with it. I never factor out the fun factor in anything. Shortwave radio has been my hobby for close to 50 years now, and I still have fun with it. And for my money, that the central point. |