"ve3..." wrote:

On Apr 10, 1:51 am, dxAce wrote:

If you were intelligent enough to use Google you'd have had the answer to hand
in a few seconds.- Hide quoted text -
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""
Look smartass, Wikpedia is not used in serious research.

Pay attention, dumbass Canuck. I said 'Google', not 'Wikpedia'.

It is free,
which would appeal to you, but it is not authoritative. Proper
research uses authorised sources. Also, you do not know what
information I was seeking.

Sure I do... you asked the questions, retard. And, if I did not know what
information you were seeking, how can you possibly blame me for not providing it to
you?

Oh I see! Research methods must have been
another lecture you missed at collich.

I didn't miss a thing.

"ve3..." wrote:

On Apr 9, 10:48 pm, wrote:
I have never seen anything wrong with dxAce's talk.
cuhulin

Have you read MII's list of DxAce's obscenities?
Shall I post it again?

Go ahead. Everyone's seen it already.

Redundancy is a Canucky trait!

On Apr 10, 7:39 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On Apr 9, 10:48 pm, wrote:
I have never seen anything wrong with dxAce's talk.
cuhulin

Have you read MII's list of DxAce's obscenities?
Shall I post it again?

Go ahead. Everyone's seen it already.

Redundancy is a Canucky trait!

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""
Have you no sense of shame? Even Imus apologised for less.

On Apr 10, 7:39 pm, dxAce wrote

Redundancy is a Canucky trait!

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""
At last! a compliment. But do you mean redundant in terms of back-up
systems in critical applications, or as in information theory where a
signal is repeated to ensure accuracy? But thanks anyway.
By the way Google leads to the official NASWA page on wikpedia but
it doesn't matter. Google sites and wikpedia are not acceptable
research sources. Please pay attention.

In article c%DSh.18268$hO2.11352@edtnps82, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article oLASh.58084$__3.43214@edtnps90, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:
OK, you don't like moron. What would you use then?

That word has been universally replaced by 'dxAce'.

Remember him? He's the drunken pig who has the foul mouth and just
a few racial groups he despises.

Snip

He had a medical problem called pain. Give him a little leeway.

I don't see your reply being any better than the person you accuse,
try again.


Pain causes obscene talk in public forums? I've never seen ANYONE but
him go on a day long tirade of obscenity and hatred. The whole
episode had the stench of alcohol about it.

Well, I don't know about alcohol but apparently pain killers were in
use. People have a tendency to strike out when they are hurting.

You defend him by recommending leeway. How about the 'Ace' apologizes
for the offensive stupidity? Not very likely, is it? Manners and
forgiveness are for OTHER people, right?

Somehow, I feel the countless thousands of 'tards surrounding Lare
aren't up to cutting much leeway.

Don't use other people as an excuse for your own behavior.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article .com,
"ve3..." wrote:

On Apr 9, 9:49 pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article .com,





"ve3..." wrote:
On Apr 9, 12:57 am, Telamon
wrote:

I'll make a deal with you. You apologize to DxAce and then I'll
apologize to you. How's that for an idea?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""
I would have liked to apologise to DxAce for mistaking his praise for
a slur, but his cryptic answer, while correct, did not meet the idea
of the whole truth. I had to write to NASWA to find the truth of the
matter and I have not heard from them yet. If he had answered with
full disclosure, I would have apologised, but I thought his answer was
close to prevaricating.

So let's say we proceed on the assumption that DxAce was paying him an
obvious complement and you took it the wrong way insulting DxAce in the
your post. Then you took umbrage at my slur toward you for that action.

Well, the deal still stands. You apologize to DxAce and I am more than
happy to extend the same forbearance and grace toward you once I see
that you are willing to extend the same to someone else.

Your move.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

ve3... wrote:

Have you no sense of shame? Even Imus apologised for less.


dxImus has a certain cachet...


ho ho ho



mike

Telamon wrote:

Somehow, I feel the countless thousands of 'tards surrounding Lare
aren't up to cutting much leeway.

Don't use other people as an excuse for your own behavior.


Quite right. I shouldn't...but when dxImus is the 'other' people it's
extremely hard not sinking to his level. His confusion of apology for
weakness says a lot about the lack of substance in his make up.






mike

I'm a dumbass II wrote:

ve3... wrote:

Have you no sense of shame? Even Imus apologised for less.

dxImus has a certain cachet...

So does 'I'm a dumbass II'...

Hee hee hee



ho ho ho

mike

"ve3..." wrote:

On Apr 10, 7:39 pm, dxAce wrote

Redundancy is a Canucky trait!

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""
At last! a compliment.

Not. I don't compliment dumbass Canucks. Please pay attention.

But do you mean redundant in terms of back-up
systems in critical applications, or as in information theory where a
signal is repeated to ensure accuracy? But thanks anyway.
By the way Google leads to the official NASWA page on wikpedia but
it doesn't matter. Google sites and wikpedia are not acceptable
research sources. Please pay attention.