Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#211
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 9:57 am, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: ve3... wrote: (3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every effort to tell the truth So, history begins and ends with you. The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be? I had no idea you were so significant. That's your opinion, not mine. You may consider me properly awed. You're odd alright. It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts. I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong. Nice going. You're welcome "Mommy...he hit me back first." Please get past the childish level. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""" Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple, the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First Amendment. Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination. It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race, religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin. It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the friendly Americans I am used to. Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case. The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in future. VE3 - So there is NO 'discrimination' in Canada - - - Wow - That Boggles the Mind ~ RHF Note - I am sure that the First Peoples will be oh so glad to hear that ! VE3 - Your History Lesson for Americans about their very own US Constitution is that the First Amendment 'allows' Americans to Discriminate and it in American's "Nature" to Discriminate. - - - Oh Mister High and Mighty - That's a Big One ~ RHF WHAT DOES - The First Amemdment Really Say . . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment - - - The Concept of "Freedom of Speech" in the USofA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom..._United_States Lets see . . . Freedom of Speech -vice- Hate Speech The Right To Speak Freely -vice- Limited Speech Imposed by Government Intimidation of Speech. - - - Well I CHOOSE : Freedom of Speech and The Right To Speak Freely -sorry- If You Hate To Hear That ! VE3 - Clearly 'you' are an exceptional individual who is no mere Canadian -butt- Someone who has reached the Exalted Level of The Order of the American Bashers (OAB) with the ceremonial title of "Sir Can-A-Duh-Ian". - - - All Hail to VE3 the Ayatollah of Can-A-Dee-Olah ! |
#212
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 11:00 am, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote: On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: ve3... wrote: (3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every effort to tell the truth So, history begins and ends with you. The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be? I had no idea you were so significant. That's your opinion, not mine. You may consider me properly awed. You're odd alright. It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts. I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong. Nice going. You're welcome "Mommy...he hit me back first." Please get past the childish level. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""" Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple, the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First Amendment. Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination. It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race, religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin. It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the friendly Americans I am used to. Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case. The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in future. How does pointing out the fact that you're a dumbass Canuck equate to being "Hate Speech"?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The Truth Hurts and -if- It Hurts - It's Hate [.] -cause- It is Hateful to point out the Truth to an O-Glorious-Exhaled-Can-A-Duh-Ian . . . It makes their pea-brains hurt and causes them unending pain. Oh the Pain of Being a Can-A-Duh-Ian - A Life Time of Almost Being an American - it just hurts . . . ~ RHF |
#213
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() RHF wrote: On May 16, 9:57 am, "ve3..." wrote: On May 14, 10:52 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: ve3... wrote: (3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. I am not resposible for what someone else says on the site whether he is a Canadian or not. I AM resposible for what I say and I make every effort to tell the truth So, history begins and ends with you. The history of my postings begins with me.. how else could it be? I had no idea you were so significant. That's your opinion, not mine. You may consider me properly awed. You're odd alright. It's not often that I find someone so determined to perpetuate a bitchfest that they admit to not caring about the facts. I challenge you to find one of my facts that is wrong. Nice going. You're welcome "Mommy...he hit me back first." Please get past the childish level. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""" Your post does, however raise a question that I have been hunting for because the thoughts are alien to Canadians. It is, pure and simple, the American trait to discriminate which is based on the First Amendment. Europe, Britain, and Canada all have laws against discrimination. It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of race, religion, national origin, etc. It does not even occur to a Canadian that he would be discriminated against because of his national origin. It's just not done. So that is why Canadians signing on to this website, as they have a perfect right to do, are immediately attacked by a local gang, who, I hasten to add, in no way represent the friendly Americans I am used to. Well boys, have your fun, because the Hate Speech laws currently going through Congress, and they will pass, will make it Illegal to speak against a person because of his national origin..All it would take is a complaint, backed up by web evidence, to get an ambitious Federal Prosecuting Attorney on your case. The free-wheeling days of slurs, insults, and name-calling are coming to a close. If I were you, I would weigh my words carefully in future. VE3 - So there is NO 'discrimination' in Canada - - - Wow - That Boggles the Mind ~ RHF Note - I am sure that the First Peoples will be oh so glad to hear that ! That was just more Canuck BS on his part. VE3 - Your History Lesson for Americans about their very own US Constitution is that the First Amendment 'allows' Americans to Discriminate and it in American's "Nature" to Discriminate. - - - Oh Mister High and Mighty - That's a Big One ~ RHF WHAT DOES - The First Amemdment Really Say . . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment - - - The Concept of "Freedom of Speech" in the USofA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom..._United_States Lets see . . . Freedom of Speech -vice- Hate Speech The Right To Speak Freely -vice- Limited Speech Imposed by Government Intimidation of Speech. - - - Well I CHOOSE : Freedom of Speech and The Right To Speak Freely -sorry- If You Hate To Hear That ! VE3 - Clearly 'you' are an exceptional individual who is no mere Canadian -butt- Someone who has reached the Exalted Level of The Order of the American Bashers (OAB) with the ceremonial title of "Sir Can-A-Duh-Ian". - - - All Hail to VE3 the Ayatollah of Can-A-Dee-Olah ! . . . . yes - thank god {allah} i am an american - amen ~ RHF . . . . |
#214
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 1:18 pm, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 9:22 pm, dxAce wrote: "ve3..." wrote: On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: ve3... wrote: There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US. Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult unanswered' stance. So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first. Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop. Your call. I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy. Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces. Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted Bush. And here we have it. History starts at a random point of convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM. So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started the insult fest first. "Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that. But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you? No insult unanswered, indeed. I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your righteousness. No insult unaswered, indeed. Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the border, and then you object to the response with indignation. "MOM, he hit me back first." """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""" First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming." Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider. (1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he." Great example of "getting your facts straight." PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does. (2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience. Convenient to who? You? Better him than a dumbass Canuck. How far back do you want to go? Chretien didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like Roosevelt......... Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks. Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks. Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash. Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash. So what? You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the discussion, not when you want to shift your argument. My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks. That's why I ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which you objected. Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass future. Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass! It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing. Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread. (3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were drooling at the prospect of a new victim. Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing? Drooling over the USofA. To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will ignore one you have another think coming. Run along now!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""" VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - VE3 - Ain't America Great ! - Freedom of Speech -and- The Right To Be Wrong - Even When You Are Right ! The Right To Be Right - Even When You Are Wrong ! as for canada . . . oh never mind ~ RHF |
#215
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 4:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse... VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007 If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in Afghanistan keeping them in those caves. B Brian O - Canada has Troops in Afghanistan Too. However the Caliphate {Islamic Rule} of Canada http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate is coming soon to America's Northern Neighbor. Sharia {Islamic} Law is now being practiced in Canada http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4215182.stm http://www.youmeworks.com/sharia_canada.html http://www.nosharia.com/ it would seem that canada has rolled-over and is ready to submit to islamic rule ~ RHF |
#216
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian O wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no... Brian O wrote: snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse... VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007 If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in Afghanistan keeping them in those caves. B Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new home in Pakistan. I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq but both operations were done in a half-assed manner. JB Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out. Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry self around over here. If they were chasing Barnyard, or any other Canuck around they'd be crying their eyes out begging for help from the US of A. |
#217
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Barnard" wrote in message news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no... Brian O wrote: snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse... VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007 If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in Afghanistan keeping them in those caves. B Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new home in Pakistan. I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq but both operations were done in a half-assed manner. JB Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out. Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry self around over here. B |
#218
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "RHF" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 4:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote: snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse... VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007 If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in Afghanistan keeping them in those caves. B Brian O - Canada has Troops in Afghanistan Too. However the Caliphate {Islamic Rule} of Canada http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate is coming soon to America's Northern Neighbor. Sharia {Islamic} Law is now being practiced in Canada http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4215182.stm http://www.youmeworks.com/sharia_canada.html http://www.nosharia.com/ it would seem that canada has rolled-over and is ready to submit to islamic rule ~ RHF . They may have troops, but they arent there in nearly the force we are, and are not nearly pouring in as much money as we do. Until they do, they dont have any reason to talk. I havent heard of any Canuck troops being killed in Afganistan or Iraq lately. B |
#219
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 7:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse... VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007 If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in Afghanistan keeping them in those caves. B """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""" I am afraid that your dispute is with David Walker, Comptroller General of the United States. I am but a mere scribe reporting an item about American life that I thought might be of interest. I have no opinion about the matter, I just report. Let us know how your letter to Mr. Walker is received. |
#220
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ve3..." wrote: On May 16, 7:19 pm, "Brian O" wrote: snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse... VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007 Fact #2 "I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal irresposibility." David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007 If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in Afghanistan keeping them in those caves. B """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""" I am afraid that your dispute is with David Walker, Comptroller General of the United States. I am but a mere scribe reporting an item about American life that I thought might be of interest. I have no opinion about the matter, I just report. Let us know how your letter to Mr. Walker is received. You have no opinion? Surely that is just more Canuck BS. LMFAO at the dumbass yet again. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|