On 6 May 2007 14:41:57 -0700, "ve3..." wrote:

On May 6, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 16:42:39 -0400, dxAce
wrote:

wrote:

Yeah...funny huh? Why is it that they can't talk about their own
affairs? They just want to butt into other folks business. Go figure!
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""
You guys can dish it out but you can't take it. Stop whining about
being bested by Canadian replies to your stupid anti-Canadian
slanders. DxEcch started these anti-Canadian rants long ago and he has
attracted similar-minded mouth-breathers and knuckle draggers.
You started this: now face the consequences. You are being made to
look like idiots to a thousand registered members.


You don't have to register for this group you idiot. So tell my why
you are scared of kitty cats?

I don't think that making a on topic post about something that I heard
on my sw radio and then read on CNN has anything to to with the
politics of any country. Cato pointed out that I was wrong on a few
statements and I agree with him. He also pointed out that there are
idiots in Canada too and that I also agree with him. You and Mike are
living, breathing proof of that. The more you post the more that these
thousands of registered users can see that. You belong right up there
with Barnard and David the anti Americans. Get a life Kenneth!

On May 5, 6:01 am, wrote:

Reprinted from the faq for you:

"Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT
limit
discussions to shortwave only."

Besides, I first heard this story on the SW bands. Tht puts it clearly
on topic.

Have a nice day.

This is a fine example of a selective and intellectually dishonest
quote, taken out of context in a way that is intended to be
misleading. An honest reading of the FAQ would show that this was
intended to include other radio-related topics, and not to include
anything and everything. This is obvious in a more complete quote:

"Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT
limit discussions to shortwave only. Any radio-related topics are
welcome."

Also, the range of relevant topics is clearly stated in the preceding
paragraph:

"This group is intended to be a place where ANY radio monitoring topic
can and should be discussed. We are happy to hear from posters who
listen to any part of the radio or microwave spectrum, from DC to
daylight. We discuss topics of almost any kind, ranging from (but not
limited to) shortwave broadcasting, DXing small or distant shortwave
stations, utility and teletype monitoring, military eavesdropping,
station schedules, QSLing sw broadcasters, spectrum usage, equipment
design and modifications, antennas, receiver reviews and
recommendations, and many more."

Shame on you for your dishonest attempt to deceive.

On 6 May 2007 15:14:11 -0700, "
wrote:

On May 5, 6:01 am, wrote:

Reprinted from the faq for you:

"Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT
limit
discussions to shortwave only."

Besides, I first heard this story on the SW bands. Tht puts it clearly
on topic.

Have a nice day.

This is a fine example of a selective and intellectually dishonest
quote, taken out of context in a way that is intended to be
misleading. An honest reading of the FAQ would show that this was
intended to include other radio-related topics, and not to include
anything and everything. This is obvious in a more complete quote:

"Despite what the newsgroup name might imply, we definitely DO NOT
limit discussions to shortwave only. Any radio-related topics are
welcome."

Also, the range of relevant topics is clearly stated in the preceding
paragraph:

"This group is intended to be a place where ANY radio monitoring topic
can and should be discussed. We are happy to hear from posters who
listen to any part of the radio or microwave spectrum, from DC to
daylight. We discuss topics of almost any kind, ranging from (but not
limited to) shortwave broadcasting, DXing small or distant shortwave
stations, utility and teletype monitoring, military eavesdropping,
station schedules, QSLing sw broadcasters, spectrum usage, equipment
design and modifications, antennas, receiver reviews and
recommendations, and many more."

Shame on you for your dishonest attempt to deceive.


I don't think that was deceptive at all. I told you that I heard it on
the SW bands at the end of my post. I need to do no more. Shame on you
for trying to make my on topic post look off topic.

On May 6, 3:20 pm, wrote:

I don't think that was deceptive at all. I told you that I heard it on
the SW bands at the end of my post. I need to do no more. Shame on you
for trying to make my on topic post look off topic.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That is a real stretch. Given that standard, it would be on-topic for
me to post about the death of Princess Di or Anna Nicole Smith because
I had heard about them on shortwave, without indicating in any way how
they were relate to radios.

You did not cite a SW source in your original post. You copied an
article by Reuters. You only came up later with the "heard it on SW"
claim, apparently in a desperate attempt to create a figment of
relevance. There was no obvious intent to discuss this in the context
of any radio transmission. It looks like more evidence of your
honesty and integirty.

On May 6, 12:29 am, m II wrote:
RHF wrote:
However there are a few Can-A-Duh-Ians like "M II"
who have nothing good or bad to say about Canada
-and- everything Bad to Say about America and
Preach Hate for Americans.

Why have you never condemned Burr and dxAce for their drunken racist
remarks? Or the pervert cuhulin for his racist 'slopehead/slanteye'
comments? Seems to me you are being a hypocrite.

As for Americans, well now...support for the war monger idiot prince now
in power is fading rapidly as people are pulling the wool away from
their eyes. Notice how even the cockroach neocons have distanced
themselves from the debacle in the Middle East. They've left Bush
flapping in the wind.

It appears as though at least seventy percent of the US population is
aware that the present course of action is WRONG. That is a very GOOD
thing.

Love ya, RHF.

mike

Mike -if- DX Ace and Burr were to write the same sort of
Bad Things to Say about America and Preach Hate for
Americans - I would reply to them as I have replied to you [.]

But As Americans It Is Their Right To Say It -and-
As An American It Is My Right To Refute It [.]

Now with Respect to America - Look down at the Soil
that you are standing on and Say : This Is Not America.
I Am A Canadian -and- I Need to Focus on Canada
First and Fix Canada First -before- I go off-the-deep-end
and Attack America and Americans for what is Rightfully
Their Nation and Their Business [.]

m ii - be proud and happy that you are a canada
-and- grow out of the american angst ~ RHF

On May 6, 10:41 am, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 6, 3:29 am, m II wrote:





RHF wrote:
However there are a few Can-A-Duh-Ians like "M II"
who have nothing good or bad to say about Canada
-and- everything Bad to Say about America and
Preach Hate for Americans.

Why have you never condemned Burr and dxAce for their drunken racist
remarks? Or the pervert cuhulin for his racist 'slopehead/slanteye'
comments? Seems to me you are being a hypocrite.

As for Americans, well now...support for the war monger idiot prince now
in power is fading rapidly as people are pulling the wool away from
their eyes. Notice how even the cockroach neocons have distanced
themselves from the debacle in the Middle East. They've left Bush
flapping in the wind.

It appears as though at least seventy percent of the US population is
aware that the present course of action is WRONG. That is a very GOOD
thing.

Love ya, RHF.

mike

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""
The main problem with the citizens of the US is their inability to
understand the atrocities committed around the world by their
government.

Oh We Understand and Approve,

Although basically friendly and genial their "My country
right or wrong" mentality

Hey You Got It Straight - It Is My Country and Yes I Do
Stand Behind It Right or Wrong - Amen to That !

supports the imperial US and its 737
military bases and garrisons in 130 countries

Glad to Know We Are Doing Such a Great Job !

and explains why there is so much dislike of Americans..

The Rest-of-the-World May Not Love Us Americans.

The Rest-of-the-World May Not Respect Us Americans.

The Rest-of-the-World Shoudl Damn Well Fear Us Americans !

Bush's approval rating is down to 28% so the American
people are starting to wake up.

Until the next US President is Elected Geoge "W" Bush
is the US President and He Is My President [.]

I have no disagreement with MII's post above. He is
telling you home truths but he is provoked by troublemakers.

So It Is A-OK In Your Opinion for a Canada to Trash Talk
America -but- Americans Defending American from the
Trash Talk are "Troublemakers" - It Boogles the Mind ! ! !

Those who deliberately stir up trouble should be
condemned or at least ignored.

That would be a very good reason for you to distant
your self as a Canadian form M II who's mission here
seems to be to Trash Talk America and Americans.

Canada has lent the US 150 billion dollars to finance the Iraq war.
I doubt if it will ever get it back with the US debt near 8 trillion
dollars and rising rapidly. Perhaps this is why the Canadian mint has
issued a 100kg gold coin .9999 pure. It about 50cm dia and 3cm thick.
It already has orders in the $3,000,000 range. We have to get that 150
billion back somehow.

I am sure that the Government of Canada and the Good
Bankers in Canada will figure out How to make things
happen to Canada's Benefit as time goes on.

proud to say - iam an american - no apology required ~ RHF

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 6, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 16:42:39 -0400, dxAce
wrote:

wrote:

Yeah...funny huh? Why is it that they can't talk about their own
affairs? They just want to butt into other folks business. Go figure!
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""
You guys can dish it out but you can't take it. Stop whining about
being bested by Canadian replies to your stupid anti-Canadian
slanders. DxEcch started these anti-Canadian rants long ago and he has
attracted similar-minded mouth-breathers and knuckle draggers.
You started this: now face the consequences. You are being made to
look like idiots to a thousand registered members.

Registered? Where, oh dumbass one?

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 6, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 16:42:39 -0400, dxAce
wrote:

wrote:

Yeah...funny huh? Why is it that they can't talk about their own
affairs? They just want to butt into other folks business. Go figure!
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""
You guys can dish it out but you can't take it. Stop whining about
being bested by Canadian replies to your stupid anti-Canadian
slanders.

Bested? By CanaDuh?

LMFAO

On May 6, 1:04 pm, "ve3..." wrote:
On May 5, 10:43 pm, Cato wrote:



Cato replys: By this time tomorrow I will be unsubscribed from
this group. I don't have to put up with insults to my fellow Canadians
or my country from f''n assholes.

Cato

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""
If you unsubscribe, that will mean that the redneck "ignorant and
proud of it" troublemakers and name-callers will have won. Keep
hitting them with the facts. It makes their heads hurt when they try
to make their brainwashed attitudes jibe with reality. Only 28%
approve of Bush. It stands to reason that some on this website are
intelligent.
By the way, my url says "www" . that means "world wide web" not
usaweb. So knock off that "love it or leave it" (the website) crap.
I was also tempted to abandon the website because of all the
stupidity, but I ain't gonna. Anyone who insults Canada for no good
reason is going to get a hit in return even though they seem a
hopeless case.

VE3,

One simple Fact Trumps all your other facts :
# 1 - I Have This LOVE {Feeling} America [.]

VE3 -?- Can You Say The Same For Canada ?

it's a feeling thing ~ RHF

On 6 May 2007 15:38:46 -0700, "
wrote:

On May 6, 3:20 pm, wrote:

I don't think that was deceptive at all. I told you that I heard it on
the SW bands at the end of my post. I need to do no more. Shame on you
for trying to make my on topic post look off topic.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That is a real stretch. Given that standard, it would be on-topic for
me to post about the death of Princess Di or Anna Nicole Smith because
I had heard about them on shortwave, without indicating in any way how
they were relate to radios.

You did not cite a SW source in your original post. You copied an
article by Reuters. You only came up later with the "heard it on SW"
claim, apparently in a desperate attempt to create a figment of
relevance. There was no obvious intent to discuss this in the context
of any radio transmission. It looks like more evidence of your
honesty and integirty.


I don't recall the FAQ stating that I had to cite a source. It seems
that you are fabricating new rules.

Either way, I heard it while listening to the SW radio. I did not post
it to please you. If you have issues with it might I suggest a kill
filter.

Good day...