Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 22, 1:53 am, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
"David Eduardo" wrote in message t... "RHF" wrote in message oups.com... Phasing in and Increase of the Digital Signal over Time would ease the Transition to HD Radio. First Year 1% Digital Second Year 2% Digital Third Year 4% Digital Fourth Year 8% Digital Fifth Year 16% Digital A 16% Digital Signal should give a HD Radio Station a Signal Coverage Area far better then their present Analog Signal Coverage Area. Based on actually working with 40 or so HD stations, the current HD signal, on AM, covers to at least the same usable and used coverage area the analog signal reaches, sometimes more. On FM, it also reaches the same area where nearly all actual listening happens. There you go again saying that only those inside your precious city grade contours count as listeners. Probably 40-50 million people in the US would beg to differ.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - BAD - Yes - I Beg To Differ ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC at night (WABC) | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at night and the local/regiona AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at Night and the Local/Regional AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at night and the local/regiona AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC -- a way to jam skywave signals from Mexico and Canada at night, just like the USSR did with VOA, RFE/RL, ... | Broadcasting |