Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 26, 7:37 am, bpnjensen wrote:
On Jul 26, 12:59 am, RHF wrote: The Question is still out there . . . Anyone care to venture and Answer ? I will try, but the answer is simplistic (probably overly so) and could well be wrong-o. Given a small urban-suburban Lot with Limited Space. Mounting one of these two Dipoles with the Center at the Corner of the Lot with each of the Arms extended alone adjacent sides {Right Angle} and Sloping down. Would this Antenna now function more or less like : 1 - A single Inverted "V" Dipole Antenna ? 2 - Two Sloper Antennas set at Right-Angles to each other ? What would your choice be # 1 or # 2 ? pondering the imponderable - iane ~ RHF My guess, and this is because the antenna remains connected at the center (as opposed to two slopers which would presumably have no inherent electrical connection) is that it would function more as No. 1. However, because the configuration would force the antenna to be mounted at an angle, I suspect that the reception pattern would be askew, not only horizontally but vertically as well. The side lobes would likely aim upward on the side facing into the yard, and downward on the side aiming outward from the corner. If you want to get skywave from the direction of the yard, that could be a very good thing, although I'm not sure that practically it would make a big difference. This is not all that different from what I have, although the legs on my antenna are only off 180 degrees by a fraction (maybe 10 degrees) rather than at right angles. Bruce Jensen BpnJ - Good Answer - I honestly don't know "if" It is Right or Wrong -but- It is a Good Answer. ![]() tyvm ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|