| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 17 Aug, 22:31, "Dave" wrote:
I've been looking at buying a SW radio and was wondering if most receivers offer more bands (frequencies) than transceivers? I know I would need to have a license if I want to transmit but if I just want to listen, then a receiver with plenty of band coverage would be nice. I ask this because I was told that if I bought just a receiver then I would be wishing I would have bought a transceiver to enjoy SW as a participant. Then I read that someone new to SW I might be better off buying a receiver and to see if they would really want to transmit as well. Thanks for any and all help on this. Depends on your mileage and ambitions. Current transceivers have excellent general coverage properties but cost more. The Icom IC-746Pro, IC-756-series and IC-7000 are excellent receivers but are much more expensive than a general coverage receiver like the Icom R75. They all cover at least up to 30 MHz continously, some are VHF and UHF enabled. I suppose that Kenwood, Yaesu and other transceivers are equally well equipped for SW DX. But in 95% of the cases you won't hear more stations on a high-end transceiver than on a budget (R75) receiver. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| HF transceiver vs. HF sw receiver | Shortwave | |||
| Transceiver or Receiver | Shortwave | |||
| FS: COLLINS KWM-2A TRANSCEIVER & 75S-1 RECEIVER | Equipment | |||
| FS: COLLINS KWM-2A TRANSCEIVER & 75S-1 RECEIVER | General | |||
| Want to trade transceiver for receiver | Swap | |||