David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's (I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

Showing the name: David Frackelton Gleason



What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as 200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take.

Gato got your tongue, boy?

I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a
sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a
larger fee and you got a license.

Uh-Huh

John Barnard wrote:

Steve wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
You also don't seem to recall where you've worked in the past, or what
your job title is. Interesting.
I recall perfectly well... and the information has been on my website for
more than a decade. As to the job title, I know what it is, too... an
industry association got it wrong in a convention program, and dxAss
want's
to make this appear as some kind of major discovery; I did a panel along
with the heads of programming of Clear Channel, Entercom, Radio One and
Cumulus for about 3,000 attendees, all of whom knew who I was. It's a
matter
of public record.
You really need to stop parroting the posts of dxAss,, especially on
weekends and the days before and after, when it is apparent that he is in
his cups.
You are merely nothing more than a sad little pathological SOB who will
lie at
the drop of a sombrero.
Prove your previous statements and send all the documents to:
Steven R. Lare W6SWL
733 Myrtle Avenue
Holland, MI 49423
USA
Put the proof where your mouth is, Edweenie!
Stuff it. This is not a deposition. I have given names and even have a
website filled with all kinds of pictures and documents. I challenge you do
disprove anything there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're doing an exceptional job of disproving it yourself. If we just
stay out of your way you'll do all the work for us.


Then shut up and stay out of the way, moron. Nothing worse than you
acting as DxAdamandSteve's cock-puppet.

You'd know about a cock-puppet, would you not?

Are you a toe-tapper?

On Sep 8, 2:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Sep 8, 1:48 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Sep 8, 1:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
I had the calls from about 1965 into the late 60's. I really don't
remember
if one had to renew with some regularity or not. Licenses were
"courtesy"
grants in most cases.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Anything you say, Carlos.

The current holder was not even born in 1965. Mr. Maldonado is a
veritable
youngster.

- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Anything you say, Mr. Reinoso.

The guy's last name is Maldonado, not Reinoso.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Anything you say, Mr. Cesar.

On Sep 8, 2:10 pm, John Barnard wrote:
Steve wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
legroups.com...
You also don't seem to recall where you've worked in the past, or what
your job title is. Interesting.
I recall perfectly well... and the information has been on my website for
more than a decade. As to the job title, I know what it is, too... an
industry association got it wrong in a convention program, and dxAss
want's
to make this appear as some kind of major discovery; I did a panel along
with the heads of programming of Clear Channel, Entercom, Radio One and
Cumulus for about 3,000 attendees, all of whom knew who I was. It's a
matter
of public record.
You really need to stop parroting the posts of dxAss,, especially on
weekends and the days before and after, when it is apparent that he is in
his cups.
You are merely nothing more than a sad little pathological SOB who will
lie at
the drop of a sombrero.
Prove your previous statements and send all the documents to:
Steven R. Lare W6SWL
733 Myrtle Avenue
Holland, MI 49423
USA
Put the proof where your mouth is, Edweenie!
Stuff it. This is not a deposition. I have given names and even have a
website filled with all kinds of pictures and documents. I challenge you do
disprove anything there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're doing an exceptional job of disproving it yourself. If we just
stay out of your way you'll do all the work for us.

Then shut up and stay out of the way, moron. Nothing worse than you
acting as DxAdamandSteve's cock-puppet.

JB- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I actually think Tardo should stick around. He's fairly amusing on
slow days.

Steve wrote:

On Sep 8, 2:10 pm, John Barnard wrote:
Steve wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
legroups.com...
You also don't seem to recall where you've worked in the past, or what
your job title is. Interesting.
I recall perfectly well... and the information has been on my website for
more than a decade. As to the job title, I know what it is, too... an
industry association got it wrong in a convention program, and dxAss
want's
to make this appear as some kind of major discovery; I did a panel along
with the heads of programming of Clear Channel, Entercom, Radio One and
Cumulus for about 3,000 attendees, all of whom knew who I was. It's a
matter
of public record.
You really need to stop parroting the posts of dxAss,, especially on
weekends and the days before and after, when it is apparent that he is in
his cups.
You are merely nothing more than a sad little pathological SOB who will
lie at
the drop of a sombrero.
Prove your previous statements and send all the documents to:
Steven R. Lare W6SWL
733 Myrtle Avenue
Holland, MI 49423
USA
Put the proof where your mouth is, Edweenie!
Stuff it. This is not a deposition. I have given names and even have a
website filled with all kinds of pictures and documents. I challenge you do
disprove anything there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're doing an exceptional job of disproving it yourself. If we just
stay out of your way you'll do all the work for us.

Then shut up and stay out of the way, moron. Nothing worse than you
acting as DxAdamandSteve's cock-puppet.

JB- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I actually think Tardo should stick around. He's fairly amusing on
slow days.

No doubt about that. Same goes for the dumbass Canucks.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you
had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

Ya got proof of that? It never seems to show up in any Callbooks.

What kinda test did you take?

There was no test at all.

Then you did not have a license... sounds like Hose-A sold you one...
there was
a code test at that time, as far as I know.

No, there was not. I believe if sponsored by a club member, there were no
requirments. Of course, the requirements changed according to the "license
fee" you paid.

You really have no idea what it was like in Ecuador in the 60's, do you? I
did not have a refrigerator most of my time there. I preferred taking a bus
to most places instead of driving. There were 3 months of summer when two to
three days a week we had power rationing and no electricity from sunrise to
sunset. No cars had automatic transmissions. You took the wiper blades off
your car every time you parket. A first run move was $0.40 for the good
seats. In the summer, there was only enough water to bathe ever two to three
days. A phone call to the US took two to three days to place, and was booked
in advance. A call to another city could take several hours to get. There
was no such thing as a home loan or mortgage... houses were bought cash
only. 40% of the population spoke Quechua. AM stations were licensed every
20 kHz in the same city. Most AMs did not have towers as antennas. There was
no FM station until 1966 in the whole country. Quito's first commercial TV
went on the aair in 1965, and a TV set cost more than 20 times the minimum
monthly wage in the country. The airport at Quito only ran in daylight
hours, so dangerous was it. There was no frozen food section at the
supermarket (there was only one supermarket in the whole city of Quito,
too). Most food was bought fresh the same day as it was consumed. There were
no fast food restaurnats, and no hamburgers or pizzas anywhere. A live in
maid cost U$S about $40 a month. Nothing in dealings with the government was
processed for free.

Never took a driver's test, either.

Of course not, you could not pass it!

No, I just sent an assistant to get it for me. That was SOP. I don't know
anyone who took the test, either.

On Sep 8, 2:35 pm, Steve wrote:
On Sep 8, 2:10 pm, John Barnard wrote:





Steve wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
legroups.com...
You also don't seem to recall where you've worked in the past, or what
your job title is. Interesting.
I recall perfectly well... and the information has been on my website for
more than a decade. As to the job title, I know what it is, too... an
industry association got it wrong in a convention program, and dxAss
want's
to make this appear as some kind of major discovery; I did a panel along
with the heads of programming of Clear Channel, Entercom, Radio One and
Cumulus for about 3,000 attendees, all of whom knew who I was. It's a
matter
of public record.
You really need to stop parroting the posts of dxAss,, especially on
weekends and the days before and after, when it is apparent that he is in
his cups.
You are merely nothing more than a sad little pathological SOB who will
lie at
the drop of a sombrero.
Prove your previous statements and send all the documents to:
Steven R. Lare W6SWL
733 Myrtle Avenue
Holland, MI 49423
USA
Put the proof where your mouth is, Edweenie!
Stuff it. This is not a deposition. I have given names and even have a
website filled with all kinds of pictures and documents. I challenge you do
disprove anything there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're doing an exceptional job of disproving it yourself. If we just
stay out of your way you'll do all the work for us.

Then shut up and stay out of the way, moron. Nothing worse than you
acting as DxAdamandSteve's cock-puppet.

JB- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I actually think Tardo should stick around. He's fairly amusing on
slow days.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks, I'm bringing you some great news from David Gleason and Team!

The Super Prostate Formula™ is a special product that contains over a
dozen nutrients known to promote the health of the prostate gland.*
Some of the ingredients include 680 mg of saw palmetto, pygeum
africanum, stinging nettles, ginseng, pumpkin seed extract, L-alanine,
L-glycine, L-glutamine acid and essential oils. In addition, the Super
Prostate Formula™ also provides lycopene, and 500 mg of pure beta
sitosterol plus 105 mcg of selenium to provide even more antioxidant
support.*

Now folks, David Gleason only sells the best. That's why, with your
free trial offer of Super Prostate Formula™, you get a full month to
experience the difference without any risk whatsoever, just pay
shipping and handling. If you like it, within 25 days we'll send you a
3 month supply of our Super Prostate Formula™ for only $79.90, plus
shipping and handling, billed to your credit card every 3 months at
the same low price. If you don't like it, just call customer service
to cancel any future shipments and you can keep our special HD AM
radio as your free gift.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you
had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of
the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on
European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's
(I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:



OK, tell us what tests you had to take.

Gato got your tongue, boy?

I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You
had a
sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a
larger fee and you got a license.

Uh-Huh

You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin
America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test
when they did not have to?