|
David Gleason and Ginseng supplement?
Steve wrote: On Sep 8, 2:44 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you had in Ecuador. What was that call? HC1DG Ya got proof of that? It never seems to show up in any Callbooks. What kinda test did you take? There was no test at all. Then you did not have a license... sounds like Hose-A sold you one... there was a code test at that time, as far as I know. No, there was not. I believe if sponsored by a club member, there were no requirments. Of course, the requirements changed according to the "license fee" you paid. You really have no idea what it was like in Ecuador in the 60's, do you? I did not have a refrigerator most of my time there. I preferred taking a bus to most places instead of driving. There were 3 months of summer when two to three days a week we had power rationing and no electricity from sunrise to sunset. No cars had automatic transmissions. You took the wiper blades off your car every time you parket. A first run move was $0.40 for the good seats. In the summer, there was only enough water to bathe ever two to three days. A phone call to the US took two to three days to place, and was booked in advance. A call to another city could take several hours to get. There was no such thing as a home loan or mortgage... houses were bought cash only. 40% of the population spoke Quechua. AM stations were licensed every 20 kHz in the same city. Most AMs did not have towers as antennas. There was no FM station until 1966 in the whole country. Quito's first commercial TV went on the aair in 1965, and a TV set cost more than 20 times the minimum monthly wage in the country. The airport at Quito only ran in daylight hours, so dangerous was it. There was no frozen food section at the supermarket (there was only one supermarket in the whole city of Quito, too). Most food was bought fresh the same day as it was consumed. There were no fast food restaurnats, and no hamburgers or pizzas anywhere. A live in maid cost U$S about $40 a month. Nothing in dealings with the government was processed for free. Never took a driver's test, either. Of course not, you could not pass it! No, I just sent an assistant to get it for me. That was SOP. I don't know anyone who took the test, either.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Say, do you guys also sell that ginseng supplement? If so, for how much? He can certainly tell one how to visit a radio station and own it the very next day! Guaranteed... 12 easy payments. He's the Prancing Queen... |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? I have more clues than you ever thought of having, prancer! Only if "clue" is slang for "shot glass." Beer and a shot, coming right up, yessir. |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? You never held the call, nor did you pass any test. You are a f00kin poseur, much as you've always been. There was no test taken by the hams I knew there. |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC location in '69 or '70. Prove it... not what you stated previously. I'll look it up if you desire, prancer. Prove what? A renewal means I had the licence prior to the renewal. The renewal was issued in '74 at San Juan, meaning the prior one was issued in 1969. What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask for one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham gear could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as 200% of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people could become hams there. You're full of ****! Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams? Not you! If I could buy 10 kw AM transmitters or run an FM with no spots for a year, I could buy a Heathkit. And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could, easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall anyone ever even mentioning to me. You don't recall anything that might be pertinent. You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy, the culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable. You're full of ****, Edweenie... check with the State Department. You are nothing more than a hot air fairy. |
David Gleason and the Amazing HGH
On Sep 8, 3:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? I have more clues than you ever thought of having, prancer! Only if "clue" is slang for "shot glass." Beer and a shot, coming right up, yessir.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - With a little growth hormone on the side, please.... |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? I have more clues than you ever thought of having, prancer! Only if "clue" is slang for "shot glass." Beer and a shot, coming right up, yessir. No tip, nor a clue, for you, fairy. |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? Edweenie, the jig is up. Even the State Department does not agree with you! The US State Department has no clue about the workings of 95% of foreign governments. How would they possibly know that one could get, in 1965, a ham license in Ecuador by simply taking care of the right persons? The number of times I saw the US government screw up in Ecuador makes me totally unsurprised that the US is pretty universally hated around Latin America and the world. Your application of US rules and morals to other nations is typical of the attitude that has caused this. |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
On Sep 8, 3:10 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC location in '69 or '70. Prove it... not what you stated previously. I'll look it up if you desire, prancer. Prove what? A renewal means I had the licence prior to the renewal. The renewal was issued in '74 at San Juan, meaning the prior one was issued in 1969. What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask for one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham gear could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as 200% of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people could become hams there. You're full of ****! Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams? Not you! If I could buy 10 kw AM transmitters or run an FM with no spots for a year, I could buy a Heathkit. And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could, easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall anyone ever even mentioning to me. You don't recall anything that might be pertinent. You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy, the culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's right. 3 isn't even prime in South America. |
Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? You never held the call, nor did you pass any test. You are a f00kin poseur, much as you've always been. There was no test taken by the hams I knew there. Because you didn't own any stations, nor did you have a license... fairy! |
David Gleason and Colloidal Silver
On Sep 8, 3:12 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: OK, tell us what tests you had to take. Gato got your tongue, boy? I told you twice that the licensing process did not work that way. You had a sponsor from one of the clubs, you got a license. Or you simply paid a larger fee and you got a license. Uh-Huh You have absolutely no clue how things worked in the 60's in Latin America... or, specifically, Ecuador. why in the world would one take a test when they did not have to? You never held the call, nor did you pass any test. You are a f00kin poseur, much as you've always been. There was no test taken by the hams I knew there.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Is this true, or were you just too screwed up on colloidal silver to notice? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com