Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:55:25 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin hundreds of thousands of Arbitron diarykeepers Now, that's marketing hype if ever there was! probably only a handful of bored trailer trash that even respond, thinking there must be a catch, and if guess correctly, they could win. The sample size is published in each ratings report. The socioeconomic levels match the market, the ages match, the ethnicity matches, the geography matches. And we can see every diary for every market that we are licensed for... I have been looking at them for 37 years, and never spotted "missing diaries" or any other irregularity. Every market has a diary target, and the targets are met within a few percent every time (or the report is cancelled, like New Orleans at the time of Katrina). |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message s.com... On Sep 3, 2:36 pm, Bart Bailey wrote: In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio. Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of bloviating right wing programming, would it? -- Bart Lol. It's Tardo's wet dream that we all end up listening to hour long informerials about colloidal silver and human growth hormone in digital. The reason you hear these and the reason why you think them funny is that infomercials and brokered slots are what sustain a large percentage of AM stations today. |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David "Yeah, I'm still trying to sell this HD/IBOC crap, and pose as 'Eduardo' at the same time", wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David "Yes, I am bat **** crazy, that's why I pose as 'Eduardo'", wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... That's right, don't let the facts dissuade you from claiming that you're Hispanic! "Hispanic" is a culture. A person who spends 80% of their life, and all of their adult life in a culture will be of that culture. Or pretend to be, as you do. A person can not pretend to be of a cultural group. For example, many second generation US Hispanics are bicultural, and have elements of both "American" culture and Hispanic culture. In many cases, such people are really of a third, distinct culture, which is based on being bilingual and speaking a "special" language that is a mix of English and Spanish. In any case, culture is acquired by the individual by exposure... anyone who is nearly 100% immersed in a culture from an early age is going to be of that culture about 99%. Since you are unemployed, you might take some time to study cultural anthropology and sociology. Already took a whole bunch of classes. Ya see Edweenie, I actually have a college degree. And, I'm not unemployed, I'm retired. It would benefit you greatly; I've seldom encountered an international DXer with such a mean and horrible cultural bias and such a total lack of understanding of any language but American English. Burdick and Lederer were writing about you and those like you. Sigmund Freud wrote about you, and those like you: Bat **** crazy! |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 3, 2:48 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio. Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of bloviating right wing programming, would it? The current programming is the only thing that still works on AM. You see, what you fail to grasp is that it is not working. AM is rapidly dying. It is losing every demographic except perhaps those who are 50+. You really need to face facts and stop living in the past. You sound like you're still in 1943. I have already stated that nearly all AM audience is over 45, and a majority over 55. That is the problem; the only fix is to broaden the appeal of AM via HD because under-55's will listen to the existing content but will not listen to AM quality. |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 3:08 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:55:25 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin hundreds of thousands of Arbitron diarykeepers Now, that's marketing hype if ever there was! probably only a handful of bored trailer trash that even respond, thinking there must be a catch, and if guess correctly, they could win. The sample size is published in each ratings report. The socioeconomic levels match the market, the ages match, the ethnicity matches, the geography matches. And we can see every diary for every market that we are licensed for... I have been looking at them for 37 years, and never spotted "missing diaries" or any other irregularity. Every market has a diary target, and the targets are met within a few percent every time (or the report is cancelled, like New Orleans at the time of Katrina). Sounds like you should go into a new business recycling all of these diaries. At least then you'd be in a business with a future. You're never going to talk people out of progress. Time marches on. Deal with it. |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 3:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 3, 2:48 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio. Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of bloviating right wing programming, would it? The current programming is the only thing that still works on AM. You see, what you fail to grasp is that it is not working. AM is rapidly dying. It is losing every demographic except perhaps those who are 50+. You really need to face facts and stop living in the past. You sound like you're still in 1943. I have already stated that nearly all AM audience is over 45, and a majority over 55. That is the problem; the only fix is to broaden the appeal of AM via HD because under-55's will listen to the existing content but will not listen to AM quality.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, but the point obviously hasn't taken hold of you yet because you still insist on living in the past. AM is dead, so let it go and embrace newer technologies. I don't think you appreciate the sorry state of AM programming today. |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 3, 2:48 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio. Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of bloviating right wing programming, would it? The current programming is the only thing that still works on AM. Talk on the other side of the spectrum has failed miserably in many, many markets... What else do you suggest (and i can probably count the hundreds of times it has been tried and failed for you). I suggest doing absolutely nothing. AM is dying. Let it die. Stop living in the past. Embrace the future. Accept progress because it is inevitable. You have to realize that time does not stand still for anyone, not even Ibiquity's stockholders. iBiquity has only about 8 or 10 shareholders... and "they are us" to some extent. Many larger radio companies helped finance the establishment of iBiquity based on the the AT&T / Lucent wpork and patents. The reason, over 10 years ago, was to find a way to offer digital services on band for AM and FM. Separate AM solutions had been proven not to work back with C Quam AM stereo, so the decision was reached that AM, already in decline, would only have a chance if it rode on a technology that FM would push... the problem with AM is the audio quality and analog noise, and HD fixes that quite handsomely. |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 3:10 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message s.com... On Sep 3, 2:36 pm, Bart Bailey wrote: In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio. Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of bloviating right wing programming, would it? -- Bart Lol. It's Tardo's wet dream that we all end up listening to hour long informerials about colloidal silver and human growth hormone in digital. The reason you hear these and the reason why you think them funny is that infomercials and brokered slots are what sustain a large percentage of AM stations today.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The reason this type of programming sustains a large percentage of AM stations today is because AM has lost practically all of its listeners who are below the age of 50. The younger listeners are no longer there and this is a fact whether you accept it or not. |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:48:08 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... spectrum has failed miserably in many, many markets... What else do you suggest (and i can probably count the hundreds of times it has been tried and failed for you). A true left of center format, not some watered down Rush style screed from a pseudo left station owned by a mega corp like Clear Channel, I'm talking about KLSD 1360 here. Say, if a true left format like Pacifica is so benign, why did the right wing conspiritors of xlnc have to plop down on KPFK's freq? KPFK had no guaranteed or protected coverage in San Diego county, by US or any other law. Grandfathered stations are protected to the extent of a compliant Class B in Los Angeles, and that means to about San Juan Capistrano in Orange County, so XHLNC is totally legal... and was founded and owned by a member of Mexico's most liberal party at the time... the PRI. KPFK hardly has any listeners in LA, and did not register any in San Diego prior to XHLNC going on. |
#80
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 3:15 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 3, 2:48 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Bart Bailey" wrote in message ... In posted on Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:01:33 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin People under 50 to 55 will just not listen to the quality of AM radio. Wouldn't have anything to do with the whole dial being full of bloviating right wing programming, would it? The current programming is the only thing that still works on AM. Talk on the other side of the spectrum has failed miserably in many, many markets... What else do you suggest (and i can probably count the hundreds of times it has been tried and failed for you). I suggest doing absolutely nothing. AM is dying. Let it die. Stop living in the past. Embrace the future. Accept progress because it is inevitable. You have to realize that time does not stand still for anyone, not even Ibiquity's stockholders. iBiquity has only about 8 or 10 shareholders... and "they are us" to some extent. Many larger radio companies helped finance the establishment of iBiquity based on the the AT&T / Lucent wpork and patents. The reason, over 10 years ago, was to find a way to offer digital services on band for AM and FM. Separate AM solutions had been proven not to work back with C Quam AM stereo, so the decision was reached that AM, already in decline, would only have a chance if it rode on a technology that FM would push... the problem with AM is the audio quality and analog noise, and HD fixes that quite handsomely. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And a pillow will make a horse-drawn carriage ride better. Good luck with that. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|