Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 3, 3:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... Yes, but the point obviously hasn't taken hold of you yet because you still insist on living in the past. AM is dead, so let it go and embrace newer technologies. I don't think you appreciate the sorry state of AM programming today. The AMs with good signals are not dead, and can be enhanced by technology. The ones with bad signals are, for the moment, surviving in many cases with brokered or religious shows. And in many rural markets, AMs are quite viable. But, in the near future, something has to be done to "modernize" the audio of AMs on the same band the stations are on now; some inferior stations may die, but AM can be viable for some time with change. I wish I could make the world's young consumers throw away their ipods and develop a keen interest in colloidal silver, but I can't. No one can. I'm sorry, but it's time to modernize. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|