Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 3, 8:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 3, 8:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: the real issue here. There are currently more AM listeners under 50 than over 50. That is per Arbitron. The issue is that only 20% of all radio listening is to AM, because in the rated markets there are so few good AM facilities that can compete. The ones that can, get great ratings and huge billing.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Only 20%. Good grief. You're in more trouble than I thought. The people in trouble are those with AMs with bad signals. Since we only have about a dozen AMs (including 7 with 50 kw) they are not a major part of the business. Our FMs do just fine, too. Yes but when you're part of an entire industry in decline, it's going to catch up with you sooner or later. Maybe you should post your resume on hotjobs or something. The radio industry is in slow growth, not decline. 2006 ended higher than any year in the past, and since 1950, radio has grown every year but tow (2001 and a recession year in the 70's) and you can find a chart of this at the RAB website. Certain sectors of radio have sustained double digit growth for the last 20 or so years, and I am in one of those sectors; we were up 12% in revenue in Q2 of 2007 when the rest of the industry was down about 2%. I am not going to be spending much time on a resume, methinks. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|