LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old September 8th 07, 09:20 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...


The only one tripping tonight is you.


I see you can't answer simple questions on the technical terms you use,
which pretty much disproves the BS you have propagated via Usenet and
the web that you have built transmitters and understand how to couple
them to towers. You completely fabricated that stuff.


Actually, for several years I had the only OIB in Ecuador, and was
frequently called on to tune towers.


Yeah sure thing. You don't know mathematical or technical terms but you
can tune towers. Give me a break.

If you really were "frequently called on to tune towers" then you must
have had a method. Maybe you could explain this tuning method. There are
always times when you go to tune some circuit or box or tower and it
does not tune up right. Maybe you have a notable example of when things
did not go right and you had to change methods or trouble shoot the
tower/coupling circuits before it would tune up?

All you can do for an explanation of field strength is point to the FCC
web site. You can't use your own words to explain the terms.


Well there is a point we can agree on. That is all you can do. All I
have been asking is for you to put it in your own words. If I can do so
can you.

I gave you an explanation, consisting of the context in which broadcast
engineers use the term. Very few are experts in propagation theory, most can
not design a directional array. Our interest in signal contours is based on
insuring management that we are getting all the coverage we are legally
licensed for....

And the fact still remains... and this is where this started... that
listeners do not commonly listen beyond the 10 mv/m contour on AM and beyond
the 64 dbu on FM... based on analysis of ZIP codes where listening to
stations takes place and the available "listenable" stations in each ZIP
code.


You gave a very weak "someone else's explanation." I'm not asking hard
questions of you. I just want to know whether you understand the
terminology you use to make a point. You make many posts to the news
group. You should know what you are talking about. I suggest you sit
down with an engineer and have him explain them to you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(OT) : "MM" Requests Any Responses Containing Parts Or All Of My Posts Have The "X-No-Archive:" In The First Line To Avoid Permanent Archiving. RHF Shortwave 0 February 24th 07 02:33 PM
"meltdown in progress"..."is amy fireproof"...The Actions Of A "Man" With Three College Degrees? K4YZ Policy 6 August 28th 06 11:11 PM
K1MAN Ordered by FCC To "Pay Up" (Forfeiture Order )! Jeff Maass Dx 7 March 31st 06 03:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017