Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 9, 4:24 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... Do you understand english well? What part of KNX is strong, no noise or static do you not understand? I'm not tolerating anything in the way of poor reception. Full quieting no interference on a battery operated portable indoors. Same good reception in the car. Obviously, focusing on one station is a bad practice. When you look at hundreds of staitons in many, many markets and find that nearly uniformly there is no listening where the signal is below certain parameters, one can conclude that what may be acceptable to you is not acceptable to the vast and wide radio listening public, because they seldom can be seen to exhibit the behaviour you believe they should. Obviously, if such correlations of signal vs. listening spread across two bands and all formasts, then there is something different about what you expect from the radio, not about listening in general. Since I am a program listener and not a DXer I'm not willing to put up with noise and interference. The one example is representative of 7 stations in my list of 11. Only 4 stations are 10mV/m. 3 to 4 mV/m is enough to drive a crystal radio for good reception. Your assessment of the 10mV/m signal level density puts you at odds with what is on the V soft page for a strong signal. If there is no listenership in the city of Ventura I would say it is because of the programming. Traffic reports during the prim time drive that does not cover Ventura, Oxnard, and Camarillo. The market is named Oxnard / Ventura. The fact that all other out of market stations don't get listening outside the contours I have mentioned makes your one market / one station example irrelevant. When stations of all formats in all kinds of markets perform the same way, you can see that there is nothing format related in this analysis. The average listener will not tune in an AM signal that is below about 10 mV/m because it does not provide enjoyable listening, irrespective of the format. I don't see a problem receiving all 11 stations on my list. The radio locator and the V soft web pages list them as strong signals. The only way you don't get them on a portable radio is to put them in the antenna null. -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Telamon, The 'implication' of your remarks is that within 3-5 Years you will not be an AM/MW Radio Listener at all; because most of what you use to Listen to on the AM/MW Band will be obscured by IBOC "HD" Radio Digital {Hash} Noise. And you along with many more former AM/MW Radio Listeners will find other sources of Listening Entertainment : FM Radio; XM/Sirius Satellite Radio; Internet Web-Radio; iPod; Shortwave Radio; etc. THE DEATH OF AM/MW RADIO MAY BE NEAR : The Pallbearers Names are "I" "B" "O" "C" "H" "D" life exists beyond the 10mv/m contour ~ RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|