Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = On Sep 11, 12:38 pm,
= = = (Michael Black) wrote: - - RHF ) writes: - - Michael Black - So In Your 'Opinion' Posting Shortwave Listener's - - Radio Reception Reports are Off-Topic and "SPAM" - - No bozo, the issue is that there's no report here. I Think The Issue Is - You Need an Issue. You have nothing valid to say, One Man's In-Validity -is- Another Man's Self-Validity. I Think "WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC" says a lot to the 'average' Newsgroup Reader who Lacks your need for Exalted Posting Standards and Meaningful Relevance. you are merely pointing to something somewhere else. Isn't That What Links/URLs Are For ? - - - Why Waste the Bandwidth when a One Line Descrition and a Link/URL will do ? We do not need to see such junk posts on a regular basis. ? "We" ? One Man's Junk -is- Another Man's Treasure. If you were actually posting a reception report here, without all that junk pointing to elsewhere, then I wouldn't say a thing. Oh Really - Who Would You Have To Attack Then Cuhulin; DX Ace; - I am 'sure' that You would Find Someone and Some Cause to Attack. A proper reception report includes far more details. Your single line "report" wouldn't get you a QSL from any station, since there's nothing to suggest you actually did receive it, and nothing about signal strength or the other things that a station might be interested in hearin about. Thanks for Educating Me. (I should point out that reception reports were not merely about scoring QSL cards, at least not in the early days. They were a means for a transmitting station to get feedback, about the quality of their transmission and the extent of their reception area.) Thanks for the History Leason. But you aren't. You're posting something with the intent of pointing elsewhere. And You Get To Point Your Finger. You've decided you can fix up this newsgroup, but you can't because you continue to blunder. Fixing this Newsgroup is an Absurd - An Act of Madness MB - That statement would also apply to You "Fixing" Me. You've decided that it needs "on topic" posts, but all you are posting is filler, nothing important in itself. It's Important To Me -and- For Me It's Good Enough. Like I said months ago, you've picked up the worst habits of bad posters, and think they will fix the newsgroup. Does this Newsgroup need Fixing ? I'm certain by now everyone has seen your pointers to elsewhere. Yes I Am Sure That They Have. There is no reason to clutter up the newsgroup some more with what amount to empty posts. One Man's Clutter -is- Another Man's "Hey That's Interesting" Note that if you're advertising something, like those other "groups", community standards allow for a pointer in the signature. While I may be a Nasty Net-Nazi - You are clearly the Champion of this Newsgroups"Community Standards" : - - - I am in awe of your presence here among us lessor beings; such as I. But you can't even conjure up a proper signature line. And even then, you would need to be posting something that adds to the existing discussion, not merely posting so people might see your signature. You Are So RIght - I 'feel' like a Total Failure. I want you to live up to community standards, and that's why I'm picking apart your posts. I Don't Deserve You - thank you, Thank You. THANK YOU ! You are still pathalogically changing the subject headers. You Are So RIght - I 'feel' so Pathological and Pathetic. Start living up to community standards, including proper formation of sentences with only the usual amount of punctuation marks, and quoting only which you are specifically replying to, and keeping subject headers constant, and not posting empty posts, and quoting properly (you are now, or maybe continue to quote badly, so it's not really clear at what point your post starts and the bit you are quoting ends. yes, Yes. YES ! - My Sins Are Many. Once you live up to those community standards, it would be far easier to understand what you are saying. And then we can decide whether or not you have any value here or not. ? 'we' ? - I 'feel' so Value-Less. And finally, if everyone is ignoring you, then what's the point of posting your junk? Alas - I Post For Only - me, Me. ME ! Michael MB, Remember - You Are Talking To and Arguing With A "Bozo" - - - Consider the Possibilities and Permutations . . . ~ RHF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using Twin Lead or Ladder Line for your Antenna's Feed-in-Line ? - Then 'consider' a Pair of Vintage Style TV Antenna Clips . . . | Shortwave | |||
Open ladder line question | Antenna | |||
OPEN WIRE LINE | Antenna | |||
5850 | Shortwave | |||
WTB: 2" spreaders for open wire line | Antenna |