| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 6:34 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: The CEO of iBiquity said, "non is available, in development or being planned." He then went on to describe the power consumption of DACs and how he hoped the offshoot of devices like the iPod would eventually create more efficient chips and that the technology could be applied to HD. That's weird. I wonder why he'd yank your chain that way? He was probably just joking around. iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been in the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips. Nothing was said in '04 about portable devices except "we hope they can figure this one out." This is incorrect. A great deal was said and the expectation was that they'd be available very soon. Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two. Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. No, they don't. Actually, they do. Like nearly all your recent posts, you show that you don't understand the radio business model and are lying about the technical issues of HD. For example: Samsung developing new chipset for HD Radio Thursday, May 10, 2007 at 9:49 AM Samsung said they will introduce a new low-power, low-cost chipset for HD Radio receivers. These new chipsets will be an important step in the development of portable HD Radios. Samsung figures that samples of the chipset will be available before the end of the 2007 - and production anticipated for the first quarter of 2008. The low-power, high-performance chip will be capable of supporting all current and planned HD Radio technology features. It is being designed and manufactured using advanced technology and features a System-in-Package (SIP) module and a CMOS, mixed-signal single-chip tuner. Target HD Radio applications include: mobile phones, portable media players, portable navigation devices, table radios and home audio-video components. If HD Radio is able to integrate into mobile phones and portable media players before satellite radio does, then we have no one to blame but ourselves. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 6:34 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: The CEO of iBiquity said, "non is available, in development or being planned." He then went on to describe the power consumption of DACs and how he hoped the offshoot of devices like the iPod would eventually create more efficient chips and that the technology could be applied to HD. That's weird. I wonder why he'd yank your chain that way? He was probably just joking around. iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been in the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips. iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how they would be widely available at any time. Nothing was said in '04 about portable devices except "we hope they can figure this one out." This is incorrect. A great deal was said and the expectation was that they'd be available very soon. Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two. Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no? Not according to Samsung. They predict that the chipsets will be very expensive indeed. No, they don't. Actually, they do. Like nearly all your recent posts, you show that you don't understand the radio business model and are lying about the technical issues of HD. Are you talking about the radio business or the colloidal silver business? You switch back and forth all the time and it gets very confusing. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been in the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips. iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how they would be widely available at any time. No, they never did nay shuch ting; there was no chip announced until mid-2007 that could hope to run on battery power. Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two. Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no? As I though, there are no links. Like nearly all your recent posts, you show that you don't understand the radio business model and are lying about the technical issues of HD. Are you talking about the radio business or the colloidal silver business? You switch back and forth all the time and it gets very confusing. You are obfuscating with this dumb little joke... the fact is that neither you nor anyone else can prove that the Samsung chips are "more" expensive and you can not prove that iBiquity offered hope for a portable device prior to this year. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 23, 8:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been in the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips. iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how they would be widely available at any time. No, they never did nay shuch ting; there was no chip announced until mid-2007 that could hope to run on battery power. They did say it. Repeatedly. And emphatically. Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two. Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no? As I though, there are no links. Like nearly all your recent posts, you show that you don't understand the radio business model and are lying about the technical issues of HD. Are you talking about the radio business or the colloidal silver business? You switch back and forth all the time and it gets very confusing. You are obfuscating with this dumb little joke... the fact is that neither you nor anyone else can prove that the Samsung chips are "more" expensive and you can not prove that iBiquity offered hope for a portable device prior to this year. I didn't realize that "proof" is required. Isn't Samsung's word good enough? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sep 23, 8:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been in the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips. iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how they would be widely available at any time. No, they never did nay shuch ting; there was no chip announced until mid-2007 that could hope to run on battery power. Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two. Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no? As I though, there are no links. If you "thought" at all, you wouldn't be carrying on with this foolishness. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
| What Liberal Talk Radio Needs to Do - To Survive and Grow [Was: Al Franken on shortwave] | Shortwave | |||
| Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna | |||
| How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors | |||
| where PCTA's fail in logic | Policy | |||