"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been
in
the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips.

iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how
they would be widely available at any time.

No, they never did nay shuch ting; there was no chip announced until
mid-2007 that could hope to run on battery power.


Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two.

Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no?

As I though, there are no links.


Like nearly all your recent posts, you show that you don't understand the
radio business model and are lying about the technical issues of HD.

Are you talking about the radio business or the colloidal silver
business? You switch back and forth all the time and it gets very
confusing.

You are obfuscating with this dumb little joke... the fact is that neither
you nor anyone else can prove that the Samsung chips are "more" expensive
and you can not prove that iBiquity offered hope for a portable device prior
to this year.

On Sep 23, 8:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been
in
the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips.

iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how
they would be widely available at any time.

No, they never did nay shuch ting; there was no chip announced until
mid-2007 that could hope to run on battery power.

They did say it. Repeatedly. And emphatically.




Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two.

Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no?

As I though, there are no links.



Like nearly all your recent posts, you show that you don't understand the
radio business model and are lying about the technical issues of HD.

Are you talking about the radio business or the colloidal silver
business? You switch back and forth all the time and it gets very
confusing.

You are obfuscating with this dumb little joke... the fact is that neither
you nor anyone else can prove that the Samsung chips are "more" expensive
and you can not prove that iBiquity offered hope for a portable device prior
to this year.

I didn't realize that "proof" is required. Isn't Samsung's word good
enough?

On Sep 23, 8:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 23, 7:01 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

iBiquity never made claims about portables. The first mention has been
in
the Samsung press releases about low cost low power chips.

iBiquity was constantly making claims about portables and about how
they would be widely available at any time.

No, they never did nay shuch ting; there was no chip announced until
mid-2007 that could hope to run on battery power.



Then you will have no trouble producing a link or two.

Then you'd have no trouble doing your own homework, no?

As I though, there are no links.

If you "thought" at all, you wouldn't be carrying on with this
foolishness.