Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 11:13 am, Steve wrote:
The fact is, progress happens. Change happens. You can't fight them. On the other hand, sometimes progress DOESN'T happen. Remember WebTV? It was supposed to bring internet to everyone's televisions. Fail. I've learned that not all technologies win; Just because YOU want to see Wireless Internet sending music to people's cars, doesn't mean it will succeed. CONSUMERS decide, not us, and they might decide to ignore this new idea (same way they ignored Super VHS and Super Audio CD). |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 6:50 pm, SFTV_troy wrote:
On Sep 30, 11:13 am, Steve wrote: The fact is, progress happens. Change happens. You can't fight them. On the other hand, sometimes progress DOESN'T happen. Remember WebTV? It was supposed to bring internet to everyone's televisions. Fail. I've learned that not all technologies win; Just because YOU want to see Wireless Internet sending music to people's cars, doesn't mean it will succeed. CONSUMERS decide, not us, and they might decide to ignore this new idea (same way they ignored Super VHS and Super Audio CD). The thing is, in this case the choice is literally a no brainer. Consumers will be able to decide between HD radio, which lets them hear a few big local broadcasters delivering generic programming vs the thousands of stations accessible via the internet, bundled no doubt with email, web access, the whole shebang. Think about it. Internet radio will let people hear EVERYTHING they can hear on HD, together with thousands of OTHER things as well. Not much of a choice. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 5:58 pm, Steve wrote:
On Sep 30, 6:50 pm, SFTV_troy wrote: I've learned that not all technologies win; Just because YOU want to see Wireless Internet sending music to people's cars, doesn't mean it will succeed. CONSUMERS decide, not us..... The thing is, in this case the choice is literally a no brainer. Consumers will be able to decide between HD radio, which lets them hear a few big local broadcasters delivering generic programming vs the thousands of stations accessible via the internet, bundled no doubt with email, web access, the whole shebang.... Sounds complicated. History shows consumers don't like complicated things (like how to program the blinking clock on their VCRs). Terrestrial radio offers the ease of just "turning the knob". That's it. Even a mental midget can do it. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 6:50 pm, SFTV_troy wrote:
On Sep 30, 11:13 am, Steve wrote: The fact is, progress happens. Change happens. You can't fight them. On the other hand, sometimes progress DOESN'T happen. Remember WebTV? It was supposed to bring internet to everyone's televisions. Fail. I've learned that not all technologies win; Just because YOU want to see Wireless Internet sending music to people's cars, doesn't mean it will succeed. CONSUMERS decide, not us, and they might decide to ignore this new idea (same way they ignored Super VHS and Super Audio CD). How much is iBiquity paying you to shill for HD Radio? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM/MW "HD" (IBOC) Radio is a Killer Application - { It Kills the Host Analog AM/MW Radio } | Shortwave | |||
FS Killer Computer Controller Radio | Scanner | |||
killer bee linear | Shortwave | |||
Radio had no warnings of killer waves | Broadcasting | |||
Radio had no warnings of killer waves | Shortwave |