Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... I would say bandwidth. Large aspect ratio antenna elements have a narrow band of resonance. It seems to me that there are some companies out there that have tower kits that run 3 to 4 wires on spreaders so the electrical diameter of the tower is increased. This will allow the tower to have lower VSWR over the +/-15KHz required. I've been in on installing one of those kits.. lot of fun when you have the backup tower for the station only a few dozens of yards away.. you don't want to forget to connect that ground in at least two places on the way down the tower.. ![]() That's great. Tell us how it works out when you tune it up. In about 1989, we put a unipole on WDSR 1340 in Lake City, FL. The tower was actually over 90 degrees, but the base was nearly 100 feet offshore in the lake (thus the city name). The brackish water had pretty much dissolved the ground system after some 40 years, and we put down a large ground mesh in the water around the tower, and put a unipole on. The folks form Tennessee came down, and they supervised the rigger. they strapped the tower base plate to ground with three 2" copper straps, and use experience, the known impedance of the tower and the rigger to find a connect point. They were close enough that only two minor moves of less than a meter fund the right match, and the station was back on the air. The unipole did increase coverage, in an area where ground conductivity is horrible. We did not notice any audio change, good or bad. The only long term bad thing is that the outriggers had to be retensioned a bit, and in major storms flying objects could break the wires or dislodge the fiberglass yardarms that held them away from the tower, and on one occasion breaking the critters off at the tower mount. I would not want one in a hurricane prone region, as it would fly off the tower at the first impact of airborne aluminum siding or trash cans. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message . .. I would say bandwidth. Large aspect ratio antenna elements have a narrow band of resonance. It seems to me that there are some companies out there that have tower kits that run 3 to 4 wires on spreaders so the electrical diameter of the tower is increased. This will allow the tower to have lower VSWR over the +/-15KHz required. I've been in on installing one of those kits.. lot of fun when you have the backup tower for the station only a few dozens of yards away.. you don't want to forget to connect that ground in at least two places on the way down the tower.. ![]() That's great. Tell us how it works out when you tune it up. In about 1989, we put a unipole on WDSR 1340 in Lake City, FL. The tower was actually over 90 degrees, but the base was nearly 100 feet offshore in the lake (thus the city name). The brackish water had pretty much dissolved the ground system after some 40 years, and we put down a large ground mesh in the water around the tower, and put a unipole on. The folks form Tennessee came down, and they supervised the rigger. they strapped the tower base plate to ground with three 2" copper straps, and use experience, the known impedance of the tower and the rigger to find a connect point. They were close enough that only two minor moves of less than a meter fund the right match, and the station was back on the air. The unipole did increase coverage, in an area where ground conductivity is horrible. We did not notice any audio change, good or bad. The only long term bad thing is that the outriggers had to be retensioned a bit, and in major storms flying objects could break the wires or dislodge the fiberglass yardarms that held them away from the tower, and on one occasion breaking the critters off at the tower mount. I would not want one in a hurricane prone region, as it would fly off the tower at the first impact of airborne aluminum siding or trash cans. That's a good point. I didn't think about flying objects breaking the tower wires on the extenders. Every engineering solution has its down side. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... That's a good point. I didn't think about flying objects breaking the tower wires on the extenders. Every engineering solution has its down side. Then you will appreciate this: after one of the major gulf coast hurricanes, in the 70's, an engineer from Miami was hired to settle some tower destructions. One, which failed at about 80 feet and collapsed was examined. The measurements on the damaged section that caused the failure exactly matched the shape and mass of a cow which had been picked up and hurled into the tower 80 feet over the ground. You can not designee for the occasional flying cow. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 10:41 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... That's a good point. I didn't think about flying objects breaking the tower wires on the extenders. Every engineering solution has its down side. - Then you will appreciate this: after one of the major gulf coast hurricanes, - in the 70's, an engineer from Miami was hired to settle some tower - destructions. One, which failed at about 80 feet and collapsed was examined. - The measurements on the damaged section that caused the failure exactly - matched the shape and mass of a cow which had been picked up and hurled into - the tower 80 feet over the ground. You can not designee for the occasional - flying cow. Gives new meaning to "When Cows {Pigs} Fly" am'er - watch-out for that tower ~ RHF |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 1:41 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... That's a good point. I didn't think about flying objects breaking the tower wires on the extenders. Every engineering solution has its down side. Then you will appreciate this: after one of the major gulf coast hurricanes, in the 70's, an engineer from Miami was hired to settle some tower destructions. One, which failed at about 80 feet and collapsed was examined. The measurements on the damaged section that caused the failure exactly matched the shape and mass of a cow which had been picked up and hurled into the tower 80 feet over the ground. You can not designee for the occasional flying cow. What have you been listening to on shortwave lately? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC at night (WABC) | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at night and the local/regiona AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at Night and the Local/Regional AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at night and the local/regiona AMs | Shortwave |