Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ferrite rod antennas
In article
, N9NEO wrote: On Nov 30, 10:18 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , Harry7 wrote: On Nov 28, 9:58 pm, N9NEO wrote: I am wondering if a large ferrite rod would be good antenna for maybe MW and 160meter band. Would there be an advantage to using a few rods glued together? In the "ARRL Antenna Compendium, Vol. 6", there is an article describing a tuned, ferrite rod, magnetic receiving loop antenna - "The Optima 160/80-Meter Receive Antenna" by Richard Marris, G2BZQ. THE author glues ferrite rods together exactly as you propose. I never built or used one so I cannot comment on its perforance. Gluing them together is a bad idea as you can not control the gap between the rods. This small gap will ruin the inductance of the combined rods and as a consequence the Q of this antenna. Telemon, The rod isn't a closed loop like a toroid so the the gap on the rod is the distance from one face to the other. If we start with say a 7" rod then what difference is .050" of glue going to make when we glue to together to make a 14incher? I was thinking of maybe a series parallel combination of a dozen or so. Very small gaps in the rods continuity have very large magnetic field resistance. Where the rods are glued together in series for one coil they will behave more like two coils in series instead of just the one coil. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Ferrite rod antennas
Telamon wrote:
In article , N9NEO wrote: On Nov 30, 10:18 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , Harry7 wrote: On Nov 28, 9:58 pm, N9NEO wrote: I am wondering if a large ferrite rod would be good antenna for maybe MW and 160meter band. Would there be an advantage to using a few rods glued together? In the "ARRL Antenna Compendium, Vol. 6", there is an article describing a tuned, ferrite rod, magnetic receiving loop antenna - "The Optima 160/80-Meter Receive Antenna" by Richard Marris, G2BZQ. THE author glues ferrite rods together exactly as you propose. I never built or used one so I cannot comment on its perforance. Gluing them together is a bad idea as you can not control the gap between the rods. This small gap will ruin the inductance of the combined rods and as a consequence the Q of this antenna. Telemon, The rod isn't a closed loop like a toroid so the the gap on the rod is the distance from one face to the other. If we start with say a 7" rod then what difference is .050" of glue going to make when we glue to together to make a 14incher? I was thinking of maybe a series parallel combination of a dozen or so. Very small gaps in the rods continuity have very large magnetic field resistance. Where the rods are glued together in series for one coil they will behave more like two coils in series instead of just the one coil. I'm not sure that is correct, but even so, the two coils would be well coupled. I think a little math would be in order. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ferrite rod antennas
In article ,
craigm wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , N9NEO wrote: On Nov 30, 10:18 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , Harry7 wrote: On Nov 28, 9:58 pm, N9NEO wrote: I am wondering if a large ferrite rod would be good antenna for maybe MW and 160meter band. Would there be an advantage to using a few rods glued together? In the "ARRL Antenna Compendium, Vol. 6", there is an article describing a tuned, ferrite rod, magnetic receiving loop antenna - "The Optima 160/80-Meter Receive Antenna" by Richard Marris, G2BZQ. THE author glues ferrite rods together exactly as you propose. I never built or used one so I cannot comment on its perforance. Gluing them together is a bad idea as you can not control the gap between the rods. This small gap will ruin the inductance of the combined rods and as a consequence the Q of this antenna. Telemon, The rod isn't a closed loop like a toroid so the the gap on the rod is the distance from one face to the other. If we start with say a 7" rod then what difference is .050" of glue going to make when we glue to together to make a 14incher? I was thinking of maybe a series parallel combination of a dozen or so. Very small gaps in the rods continuity have very large magnetic field resistance. Where the rods are glued together in series for one coil they will behave more like two coils in series instead of just the one coil. I'm not sure that is correct, but even so, the two coils would be well coupled. I think a little math would be in order. Ever gap a ferrite switching transformer so it does not saturate? You have two rods that conduct magnetic fields well and air that doesn't. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pictures of your antennas in the Antennas in the World directory | Antenna | |||
WTB 80/40 Mor-gain or Antennas West PM Antennas | Antenna | |||
TV type Ferrite Cores / Ferrite Cores / Magnetic Longwire Baluns (MLBs) and more | Shortwave | |||
Question about Ferrite Antennas | Shortwave | |||
Question about Ferrite Antennas | Broadcasting |