Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 28th 07, 04:48 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2006
Posts: 111
Default Icom R-20 or Eton E!?

On Dec 28, 8:27*am, David wrote:
junius wrote:
Admittedly, you can boost the R20's HF capabilities with one of
these: *http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...tune/3506.html
But is it really worth it? *


That thing looks like it would put a lot of stress on the weakest point
on a handheld i.e. the BNC. *My AR8200MKIIIB needs no help receiving
down through medium wave, even with a modest antenna.


Indeed, if one isn't particularly careful, the Miracle unit could put
stress on the connector.

As for the AR8200MkIIIB, it would be a somewhat better choice for MW &
SW. And the Yupiteru MVT-9000 Mk II reportedly offers MW/SW
performance that's superior to that of the AOR. That said, if one's
main interest is in the under 30 MHz range, there are under $100
portables that will offer better performance than any of these
wideband handhelds. That's not to say that the widebands don't have
their function and appeal. One should simply be aware of what they're
getting before jumping for such a piece of gear...

junius
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 29th 07, 01:42 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 247
Default Icom R-20 or Eton E!?

junius wrote:
On Dec 28, 8:27 am, David wrote:
junius wrote:
Admittedly, you can boost the R20's HF capabilities with one of
these: http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...tune/3506.html
But is it really worth it?

That thing looks like it would put a lot of stress on the weakest point
on a handheld i.e. the BNC. My AR8200MKIIIB needs no help receiving
down through medium wave, even with a modest antenna.


Indeed, if one isn't particularly careful, the Miracle unit could put
stress on the connector.

As for the AR8200MkIIIB, it would be a somewhat better choice for MW &
SW. And the Yupiteru MVT-9000 Mk II reportedly offers MW/SW
performance that's superior to that of the AOR. That said, if one's
main interest is in the under 30 MHz range, there are under $100
portables that will offer better performance than any of these
wideband handhelds. That's not to say that the widebands don't have
their function and appeal. One should simply be aware of what they're
getting before jumping for such a piece of gear...

junius


I consider the MW-HF capability to be handy in a dull moment. I make
all my money on UHF. I seriously considered the Yupiteru based on
specs, but got the AOR because of 3rd party support like this:

http://www.butel.nl/products/ar8200/8200soft.html
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eton E5 Vs. Icom R-75 Stephan Grossklass Shortwave 0 May 3rd 07 10:36 PM
Eton E5 Vs. Icom R-75 RHF Shortwave 1 May 3rd 07 12:26 PM
Comparing the Icom IC-R75 to the Eton E1 Radio - Three Major Problems . . . RHF Shortwave 13 November 6th 05 02:07 PM
Comparing the Icom IC-R75 to the Eton E1 Radio - Three Major... [email protected] Shortwave 0 November 5th 05 10:49 PM
Eton E1XM Radio "News & Info" / Who has the Eton E1 XM Radio "For Sale" ? / Locating an Eton E1 XM Radio to Buy ! RHF Shortwave 0 August 16th 05 03:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017