Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: RHF wrote: FWIW - Burying the Coax Cable is simply one of the many Synergistic Elements that goes into making a Low Noise Shortwave Radio Listening (SWL) Antenna -a-la- John Doty Three Rec.Radio.Shortwave Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Well, "John Doty" in the reference above says: Any *unshielded* [my emphasis added] conductor in your antenna/ground system is capable of picking up noise: the antenna, the "lead-in" wire... First of all, isn't the "lead-in wire" (coaxial cable in this discussion) -shielded- ? So according to his -own- statement, coax shouldn't have to be buried, at least from a noise mitigation viewpoint. Doty continues: You can keep noise currents away from the antenna by giving them a path to ground near the house, giving antenna currents a path to ground away from the house, and burying the the coaxial cable from the house to the antenna. In the 1930s, Bell Laboratories, while investigating power line influence on telephone cables, proved that burial had NO effect on noise being induced into the telephone cables; i.e., 20 feet of aerial separation, from a noise standpoint, was exactly the same as 18 feet of aerial separation plus being buried 2 feet deep. Hmmm...should I believe "John Doty" or Bell Labs? You're a smart guy -- I'll let you figure that one out for yourself. :-) Without agreeing or disagreeing with your arguments above don't you think you should be able to come up with your own explanations and understandings on the subject? Why should we read you posts when we can just go read the person you reference? You think you somehow improve the information? I think reading your posts are a waste of time. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|