On Jan 13, 10:53�am, Zach Liang wrote:
Does nay one know about?

LAst september �i had communication with them , but since then �they
did �not responded to my emails

An order is pending

"radio" is ****ed...

IBOCcrock wrote:

"radio" is ****ed...

....which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. :-)

On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.

Hi,

Actually I pick up the BBC exceptionally well most days between 2100 - 2300
UTC on 9525 KHz & 5975 KHz......

Abb N


"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.

Abb N wrote:
Hi,

Actually I pick up the BBC exceptionally well most days between 2100 -
2300 UTC on 9525 KHz & 5975 KHz......

Abb N


"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.

I get it flawlessly every day from 0000-2400z on 2315 mHz.

On Jan 13, 11:57Â*am, dave wrote:
Abb N wrote:
Hi,

Actually I pick up the BBC exceptionally well most days between 2100 -
2300 UTC on 9525 KHz & 5975 KHz......

Abb N

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out on
and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S.
I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but, please,
feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

"Is shortwave radio dying? A look at station counts from South
America"

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to the
US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack only
carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on display.
Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too. There's
something called "progress", and the Internet.
-
- I get it flawlessly every day from 0000-2400z on 2315 mHz.
-

So now it is 'Dave' vice "David",

OK 2.315 GHz would be eitther XM a/r SIRIUS Satellite Radio
and 'not' via the Shortwave Radio.

BBC World Service on the Shortwave Radio - B07 Schedules

For Everyone Actually Interested in Hearing the
BBC World Service on the Shortwave Radio
BBC WS - http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/

BBC World Service - Global Short Wave Frequencies
BBC WORLD SERVICE - http://tinyurl.com/2acx3r
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sc...es/index.shtml
Listen to the BBC's International Shortwave Radio Station

Here is the plain text BBC World Service B07 Schedule :
BBC WS - http://www.bclnews.it/b07schedules/bbc.htm

Shortwave Radio Broadcasting Schedules "B07"
From 28 OCT 2007 to 29 MAR 2008
-source- BCL News On-Line
-website- http://www.bclnews.it/

BCL News On-Line -presents-
Shortwave Radio Broadcasting Schedules "B07"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...7e15bb5cf285ff
International Shortwave Radio Broadcasters On-the-Air 24/7 !

Shortwave Radio still offers News and Information from
Around-the-World that is Un-Censored* and Biased**.
* Un-Censored by Your Government.
** Biased by the Presentor.
For those who seek it out and are willing to Listen.

"BCL NEWS .IT" : YAHOO! Group -bclnews-
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bclnews/
Members : 115 - Messages : 12,000+

how do i know . . .
-cause- i heard it on the shortwave radio - iane ~ RHF {pomkia}

RHF wrote:

(extraneous stuff snipped)

So now it is 'Dave' vice "David",


I believe the word you intended was 'versus'



http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/vice
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/versus

Perhaps the confusion begins with a similar sounding set of words:

'vice versa', but that, also, isn't correct usage in this case.

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/vice%20versa


Hey..don't mention it.

mike

IBOCcrock wrote:

"radio" is ****ed...

On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:

...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out
on and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S. I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but,
please, feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)

IBOCcrock wrote:

Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to
the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack
only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on
display. Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
There's something called "progress", and the Internet.

Well, -if- what you say is true, then why do you keep hanging out and
posting on a group about such a dead subject? Wouldn't your time be
better spent elsewhere?

Apparently, you DO miss the irony... ;-)

On Jan 13, 3:01Â*pm, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out
on and posting to a "radio" news group ...

P.S. I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but,
please, feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)
IBOCcrock wrote:
Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to
the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack
only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on
display. Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
There's something called "progress", and the Internet.

Well, -if- what you say is true, then why do you keep hanging out and
posting on a group about such a dead subject? Wouldn't your time be
better spent elsewhere?

Apparently, you DO miss the irony... Â* ;-)

I enjoy such reactions.

On Jan 13, 3:01 pm, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out
on and posting to a "radio" news group ...
P.S. I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but,
please, feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)
IBOCcrock wrote:
Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to
the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack
only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on
display. Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
There's something called "progress", and the Internet.


Well, -if- what you say is true, then why do you keep hanging out and
posting on a group about such a dead subject? Wouldn't your time be
better spent elsewhere?

Apparently, you DO miss the irony... ;-)

IBOCcrock wrote:

I enjoy such reactions.

Let me see if I've got this straight...

You think radio is for losers.

You think radio is "****ed".

Yet you hang out here and have posted 592 messages since 8/17 about a
loser and "****ed" topic. Pardon me for asking, but wouldn't that make
YOU a loser and "****ed"?

Sorry, but your credibility is zero...