On Jan 13, 3:01 pm, Billy Burpelson wrote:
IBOCcrock wrote:
"radio" is ****ed...
On Jan 13, 11:58�am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
...which no doubt explains why you spend all your time hanging out
on and posting to a "radio" news group ...
P.S. I hope you can appreciate the irony of your statement.... but,
please, feel free to keep shooting yourself in the foot. � �:-)
IBOCcrock wrote:
Yea, this is why the BBC, and others, have stopped broadcasting to
the US - others have blown up their shortwavbe towers. Radio Shack
only carries a handful of SW receivers, and are not usually on
display. Radio is the US is declining, just a sSW radio is, too.
There's something called "progress", and the Internet.


Well, -if- what you say is true, then why do you keep hanging out and
posting on a group about such a dead subject? Wouldn't your time be
better spent elsewhere?

Apparently, you DO miss the irony... ;-)

IBOCcrock wrote:

I enjoy such reactions.

Let me see if I've got this straight...

You think radio is for losers.

You think radio is "****ed".

Yet you hang out here and have posted 592 messages since 8/17 about a
loser and "****ed" topic. Pardon me for asking, but wouldn't that make
YOU a loser and "****ed"?

Sorry, but your credibility is zero...