David wrote:

The USA is the
greatest threat to world peace.

Typical Liberal rant.

Tell ya what, you grab 'Eduardo' by the hand, or what ever appendage you feel
comfortable with and haul your sorry USA hating asses off to Ecuador or whatever
third world country that might be willing to put up with your shenanigans.

On Jan 18, 5:40Â*am, David wrote:
Mike wrote:
On Jan 17, 11:25�am, David wrote:
Mike wrote:
David wrote:
Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting
each individual site?
Why not follow rules for punctuation? �Those of us with licenses know
the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the
interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum.
(Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.)
I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts.
What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested
in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might
benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly
conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you
in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and
DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity
on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you,
more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time
posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily.
Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that
even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions
regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I
don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may
not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating
antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or
punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation
and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read.
If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT
links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has
improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't
show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about
"monkey chatter"....
To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The
racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here
have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other
places (with moderation!) where �you can get info.
Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much
valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm
truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your
posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting.
MWBRYANT
I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. �I know that proper
punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the
visually impaired. �I know that throwing up a bunch of information, some
of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone
speaks from personal experience.

1. Passive aggression can be as irritating (and as ridiculous) as
direct aggression. Both some of the most evil and stupid people I've
ever met were far less rude than Steve Lare. Even rude people can be
useful sources of information. (Thanks for today's Top News link,
Steve!)
2. I'm visually impaired. Check the archives. My R-75 has the voice
mod. RHF's stuff don't bother me. Why do you feel that you speak for
the visually-disabled?
3. You would think that a professional pseudo-journalist, like
yourself, would realize that providing contradictory links shows
respect for democratic free choice. Let the reader discern which they
choose to believe.
4. If the filter is going to be that we should be limited to
discussing
only that which is experienced-based, why are you still here? Are you
really suggesting that your real experience with shortwave radio comes
anywhere near the real-world DXing experience of Steve Lare or the
real antenna info being facilitated by RHF? I think these guys are
winning on the level of who has the most useful personal experiences
to convey.

David, exactly, what is your role in the community, again? Are you
here to tell us that we're members of a dead hobby?

Congratulations.

MWBRYANT

I have no idea what RHF's personal knowledge of antennas entails. Â*I
know he puts up links to antennas that don't work very well, are
sometimes overpriced, etc. Â*He just seems to be repeating things.

FYI I used to provide the bulk of EE language loggings for a now-defunct
DXer magazine. Â*I logged Tahiti's little flea-power on 15.XXX in
downtown Houston, in the daytime, on one of my 2 R-390As, and my 120'
steel random wire. Â*Confirmed.

This was back in the late '80s, when the Sun was spottin' and the Cold
War has hoppin'. Â*SWBC was still viable back then. Â*GHFS was almost as
entertaining. Â*Since then, it's been steadily downhill, both
propagation-wise and target wise.

david, David. DAVID !

Why do you make such "IN YOUR FACE" Statements ?

- The cultural aspect of SWL cannot be disregarded and frankly
- I'm shocked that so many "American" people here are listening
- to other cultures but not hearing the message.

David - "The Message" - You Choose to Believe 'Other' Nations
Over Your Own ! -while- Having Heard Their Message and Our
Message : I Choose To Believe My Government Over Theirs.

David - I Have An Abiding Faith In "My" Country ~ RHF
Sadly By Your Own Admission You Do Not.

-Â*The USA is a rogue nation.

David - There You Go Again - Going-Off The-Deep-End ! -
David - Clearly You Have Gotten 'The Message"
{Bought Their Anti-American Propaganda}
and Swallowed-It Hook-Line-and-Sinker.

-Â*The USA is the greatest threat to world peace.

David - There You Go Again - Going-Off The-Deep-End !
David - Clearly You Have Gotten 'The Message"
{Bought Their Anti-American Propaganda}
and Swallowed-It Hook-Line-and-Sinker.

- What! Impossible!

David - The "What!" - Yes You Are "Impossible!"

- I make no apologies for being annoying to bigots.

David - So the majority of this Newsgroups Readers and Your
Fellow American Citizens : In Your Opinion Are BIGOTS.

David - No Apology is Required For You Have Achieved and
Exceeded Your Goal of "Being" ANNOYING !

Once Again David :
* I Believe In America as a Force for Good in the World.
* I Believe In The American People and Their Basic Goodness.

(OT) : David -proclaims- The USA Is A Rogue Nation. &
The USA Is The Greatest Threat To World Peace.


God {Allah} Bless America and All Americans - Amen ~ RHF

dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

The USA is the
greatest threat to world peace.

Typical Liberal rant.

Tell ya what, you grab 'Eduardo' by the hand, or what ever appendage you feel
comfortable with and haul your sorry USA hating asses off to Ecuador or whatever
third world country that might be willing to put up with your shenanigans.


Wanna help me load the truck?

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

The USA is the
greatest threat to world peace.

Typical Liberal rant.

Tell ya what, you grab 'Eduardo' by the hand, or what ever appendage you feel
comfortable with and haul your sorry USA hating asses off to Ecuador or whatever
third world country that might be willing to put up with your shenanigans.


Wanna help me load the truck?

Heck, I'll drive the darn thing.

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David wrote:

The USA is the
greatest threat to world peace.
Typical Liberal rant.

Tell ya what, you grab 'Eduardo' by the hand, or what ever appendage you feel
comfortable with and haul your sorry USA hating asses off to Ecuador or whatever
third world country that might be willing to put up with your shenanigans.

Wanna help me load the truck?

Heck, I'll drive the darn thing.




Fair enough. I'll bring my SW-8.

In article iE_jj.15732$cz3.2213@trnddc06,
oneway wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article GZkjj.11457$cz3.4205@trnddc06,
oneway wrote:


D Peter Maus wrote:

wrote:


On Jan 15, 4:07 pm, D Peter Maus


There's a lot of personality, here, too. Truth is, Roy has
most of
it. But if Roy chooses to make a career out of participating in
this group....so what? If he's got the time and the
resources....God Bless him.

The question is....what does it matter to YOU?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
It matters because his compulsive posting of irrelevant bs has
driven
away many shortwave enthusiasts who visit daily and contribute
regularly to the group. Most no longer bother to even read the
group much less post because they have long ago tired of the
little clique of posters who now dominate the group.

It's like the friendly neighborhood bar that everyone that
mattered
once enjoyed gathering that gets taken over by a few obnoxious
drunks. The change in atmosphere is almost imperceptible because
it happens over time. One by one the regulars stop dropping in and
soon the only patrons are the obnoxious loud mouthed few and the
bar soon goes bankrupt.

So yes, it matters sir.



Then you serious need to refocus your priorities. If you can be
run
off by one poster's style...I'm guessing shortwave wouldn't be your
best choice of avocation.

The question for you Peter, is why do posters like Roy, Burr, Steve
and others get a pass from you when they are the source for most of
the OT garbage on this group? My guess is that you secretly support
their politics and world views but don't want to admitt it here. You
didn't use to be like that in the good old days. You made mostly
useful contributions and rarely responded to the OT posts. Now you
almost encourage them. What happened? (Hint: 'nothing happened' is
not an acceptable answer)


Nice Trolling whine you got going there.

Sounds like the shoe found a fit. Feeling a little guilty eh?

Sounds more like it's your way or the highway. I feel simply fabulous
thanks for asking.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

BCBlazysusan wrote:

On Jan 17, 4:18Â pm, Mike wrote:
On Jan 17, 11:25�am, David wrote:





Mike wrote:
David wrote:
Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of
posting
each individual site?

Why not follow rules for punctuation? �Those of us with licenses
know
the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in
the
interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum.

(Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.)

I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts.

What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't
interested
in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might
benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to
properly
conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you
in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and
DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity
on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that
you,
more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time
posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily.

Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that
even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions
regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I
don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He
may
not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at
disseminating
antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or
punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good
punctuation
and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read.

If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT
links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has
improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't
show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about
"monkey chatter"....

To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s.
The
racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here
have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of
other
places (with moderation!) where �you can get info.

Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much
valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm
truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your
posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting.

MWBRYANT

I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. �I know that proper
punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the
visually impaired. �I know that throwing up a bunch of information,
some
of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone
speaks from personal experience.

1. Passive aggression can be as irritating (and as ridiculous) as
direct aggression. Both some of the most evil and stupid people I've
ever met were far less rude than Steve Lare. Even rude people can be
useful sources of information. (Thanks for today's Top News link,
Steve!)
2. I'm visually impaired. Check the archives. My R-75 has the voice
mod. RHF's stuff don't bother me. Why do you feel that you speak for
the visually-disabled?
3. You would think that a professional pseudo-journalist, like
yourself, would realize that providing contradictory links shows
respect for democratic free choice. Let the reader discern which they
choose to believe.
4. If the filter is going to be that we should be limited to
discussing
only that which is experienced-based, why are you still here? Are you
really suggesting that your real experience with shortwave radio comes
anywhere near the real-world DXing experience of Steve Lare or the
real antenna info being facilitated by RHF? I think these guys are
winning on the level of who has the most useful personal experiences
to convey.

David, exactly, what is your role in the community, again? Are you
here to tell us that we're members of a dead hobby?

Congratulations.

MWBRYANT- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

***CLAPPING HANDS*** - - - Great post Mike. Good to see you in here
again. DX waving a hand.

Oh great! A big welcome back to another faux individual! The guy who claimed
to be
a PhD!

Now, he claims to be 'visually impaired'. Ask him, and ask the State of
Kentucky
if he has a drivers license.

Crap, I wear glasses, therefore, I must be 'visually impaired' as well.

Cry me a f00kin river.

Mike's problem is not being visually impaired, it's being factually
impaired.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article mP5kj.13$ec.2@trndny02, oneway
wrote:

dxAce wrote:

BCBlazysusan wrote:


On Jan 17, 4:18Â pm, Mike wrote:

On Jan 17, 11:25�am, David wrote:






Mike wrote:

David wrote:

Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting
each individual site?

Why not follow rules for punctuation? �Those of us with licenses know
the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the
interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum.

(Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.)

I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts.

What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested
in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might
benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly
conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you
in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and
DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity
on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you,
more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time
posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily.

Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that
even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions
regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I
don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may
not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating
antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or
punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation
and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read.

If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT
links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has
improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't
show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about
"monkey chatter"....

To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The
racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here
have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other
places (with moderation!) where �you can get info.

Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much
valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm
truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your
posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting.

MWBRYANT

I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. �I know that proper
punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the
visually impaired. �I know that throwing up a bunch of information,
some
of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone
speaks from personal experience.

1. Passive aggression can be as irritating (and as ridiculous) as
direct aggression. Both some of the most evil and stupid people I've
ever met were far less rude than Steve Lare. Even rude people can be
useful sources of information. (Thanks for today's Top News link,
Steve!)
2. I'm visually impaired. Check the archives. My R-75 has the voice
mod. RHF's stuff don't bother me. Why do you feel that you speak for
the visually-disabled?
3. You would think that a professional pseudo-journalist, like
yourself, would realize that providing contradictory links shows
respect for democratic free choice. Let the reader discern which they
choose to believe.
4. If the filter is going to be that we should be limited to
discussing
only that which is experienced-based, why are you still here? Are you
really suggesting that your real experience with shortwave radio comes
anywhere near the real-world DXing experience of Steve Lare or the
real antenna info being facilitated by RHF? I think these guys are
winning on the level of who has the most useful personal experiences
to convey.

David, exactly, what is your role in the community, again? Are you
here to tell us that we're members of a dead hobby?

Congratulations.

MWBRYANT- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

***CLAPPING HANDS*** - - - Great post Mike. Good to see you in here
again. DX waving a hand.


Oh great! A big welcome back to another faux individual! The guy who
claimed to be
a PhD!

Now, he claims to be 'visually impaired'. Ask him, and ask the State of
Kentucky
if he has a drivers license.

Crap, I wear glasses, therefore, I must be 'visually impaired' as well.

Cry me a f00kin river.

Here's another perfect example of a trouble maker throwing the first
stone that could lead to endless threads of name calling and threats.

Oh you don't throw any bombs do you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
David wrote:

Mike wrote:
On Jan 17, 11:25?am, David wrote:
Mike wrote:
David wrote:
Why not just post a link to the Google results page, instead of posting
each individual site?
Why not follow rules for punctuation? ?Those of us with licenses know
the rules require that communications be as clear as possible, in the
interest of keeping monkey chatter to a minimum.
(Now, Google "monkey chatter" for everyone.)
I can go back 5 years and find the same RHF posts.
What's so wrong with posting individual URLs? If you aren't interested
in the info, why bother clicking on it? Newbies, the ones that might
benefit the most from such actions, may not understand how to properly
conduct a wide-ranging search. Sometimes the search engines bury you
in URLs unrelated to what you're looking for. Castigating RHF and
DXAce simply because they post links seems to be focusing negativity
on the MOST USEFUL things those guys do in here. You'd think that you,
more than most, would be encouraging these guys to spend more time
posting links instead of ridiculing YOU daily.
Punctuation? I teach public speaking and I find that most people that
even try to have perfect grammar are suffering from delusions
regarding their own self-grandeur. Understandability is the key and I
don't have any problem understanding what RHF is trying to say. He may
not be the best speller in the world, but his efforts at disseminating
antenna info hardly are suffering from any non-standard spelling or
punctuation. There are many contributors in here with good punctuation
and spelling, but nothing of any real value to read.
If you go back five years, you'll see that RHF was posting DIFFERENT
links back then. To be honest, I think the quality of his links has
improved significantly. To be honest, going back three years doesn't
show a whole lot of evolution transpiring in your posts. Talk about
"monkey chatter"....
To be honest, RRS is infinitely better than it was in the mid-90s. The
racists and neo-Nazis that use to make about half the posts in here
have disappeared. If you don't like RRS, there are now plenty of other
places (with moderation!) where ?you can get info.
Do you really believe, David, that your own posts convey as much
valuable info as do at least some of the posts of Steve and Roy? I'm
truly sorry that you've been picked on as much as you have, but your
posts are NOT the reason I've been reading this RRS without posting.
MWBRYANT
I know I'm way less rude than DX Asshole. ?I know that proper
punctuation facilitates easier communications, especially for the
visually impaired. ?I know that throwing up a bunch of information, some
of it contradicting other of it, is not as helpful as when someone
speaks from personal experience.


1. Passive aggression can be as irritating (and as ridiculous) as
direct aggression. Both some of the most evil and stupid people I've
ever met were far less rude than Steve Lare. Even rude people can be
useful sources of information. (Thanks for today's Top News link,
Steve!)
2. I'm visually impaired. Check the archives. My R-75 has the voice
mod. RHF's stuff don't bother me. Why do you feel that you speak for
the visually-disabled?
3. You would think that a professional pseudo-journalist, like
yourself, would realize that providing contradictory links shows
respect for democratic free choice. Let the reader discern which they
choose to believe.
4. If the filter is going to be that we should be limited to
discussing
only that which is experienced-based, why are you still here? Are you
really suggesting that your real experience with shortwave radio comes
anywhere near the real-world DXing experience of Steve Lare or the
real antenna info being facilitated by RHF? I think these guys are
winning on the level of who has the most useful personal experiences
to convey.

David, exactly, what is your role in the community, again? Are you
here to tell us that we're members of a dead hobby?

Congratulations.

MWBRYANT



I have no idea what RHF's personal knowledge of antennas entails.

Snip

He studies antenna entrails.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

The USA is the
greatest threat to world peace.

Typical Liberal rant.

Tell ya what, you grab 'Eduardo' by the hand, or what ever appendage you
feel
comfortable with and haul your sorry USA hating asses off to Ecuador or
whatever
third world country that might be willing to put up with your shenanigans.


Wanna help me load the truck?

I'll pay for the gas.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California