D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
I remember something about you saying you'd not be caught dead in
Michigan!

I actually sold my half of a property in Omena to my sister... No interest
at all.


Interesting. Seems to be a theme with you and your family.
Hey, here's an idea! Maybe I could meet his *sister* at the *property* this
summer and show her the QSL's!


You know, I was just thinking that very thing.

Then, his very own *sister* could verify that I indeed have them!



She could verify several other things, too.

Yeah, that's probably why I'll never get to meet her :-)

I wouldn't go without backup. You know how excitable those Hispanics
can get.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
...
On Jan 27, 10:13 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...
On Jan 27, 9:53 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message

...

Hey, have the bitch send me a letter, on the firms letterhead. Like I
said
before, I expect to receive it in the next two weeks. Pretty easy, eh.
'Eduardo'?

You ****ing drunk maniac,

Aw, did dxAce huwt your wittle feewings? Poor wittle Edwawdo...

There is no need to call somebody he does not know a "kunt" or a "bitch"
and
so on. He's just drunk, so I guess he was a nasty piece of work in the
service... probably why he is not there any more. .

Nor is there any need to troll newsgroups. But someone who chooses to
troll newsgroups shouldn't act 'wronged and wounded' at the first hint
of rough treatment.

I can't think of a ng that has more off-topic posts. As a DXer with over
2200 veries and 87 countries,

Prove it. Post all your QSLs on the internet, notarized.

m II wrote:

dxAcehole, Supreme Commander United Michigan Militias (S.C.U.M.M.) wrote:

Stuff it up your prancing ass, 'Tardo!

You never learn, do you?

Yes, I learn more and more with each passing day! You might try paying
attention.

Quit being an embarrassment and get help.

Sounds like advice you might consider yourself.

You
are in a downward spiral leading to an alcohol induced death,

Are you talking to yourself yet again?

On Jan 30, 4:28*pm, dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I remember something about you saying you'd not be caught dead in
Michigan!

I actually sold my half of a property in Omena to my sister... No interest
at all.

* *Interesting. Seems to be a theme with you and your family.

Hey, here's an idea! Maybe I could meet his *sister* at the *property* this
summer and show her the QSL's!

Just be sure she comes alone and doesn't bring her pimp with her.

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Jan 30, 6:37*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
*Billy Burpelson wrote:





Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
news:telamon_spamshield-
As I said before, those who participate in the radio ratings, year
after
year, thousands after thousands just in your county, don't find what
you
consider to be listenable to be that, and they don't listen in
droves.
Those thousands and thousands of people don't exist. None listen of
them
listen to *my* [emphasis added] radio. Now if you want to draw some
false
conclusions based
on some marketing data about what is or is not listenable on *my*
[emphasis added] radio
you go right ahead and continue to live in your fantasy world.
The world of commercial radio is based on ratings, not "the ability to
hear"
a station. There is no fantasy involved. Each person in the sample
represents a thousand or so non-participants, and the results are the
basis
for the revenue of each significant station. The fact is, there is
pretty
much no listening to stations as shown in the ratings all over the US
when
signals are not extremely strong and noise-free

That has nothing to do with *my* [emphasis added] radio reception.

Well, you are absolutely correct. It indeed has nothing to do with
*your* radio reception. But then again, that wasn't the topic, now was
it?

It may not have been the original topic but that was the discussion
between Eduardo and I. I don't see where you think it's OK to butt in.

Surveys, ratings and polls aren't based on *your* reception (which
you mentioned three times above). I know you find it hard to believe
that the sun doesn't rise and set on *YOU*, but please, try to get that
massive ego under control.

Yeah that's the point but I don't expect you to get the point. It's OK
not to get it. I don't want you to strain yourself.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Jan 30, 6:29 pm, wrote:
-
- You wouldn't want pieces of that satellite junk falling
- on your home, your yard, would you?
- I don't want that crap falling on mine either.
- cuhulin
-

Telamon,

Lets See You Are Having A 'Private' Discourse in a Newsgroup.
IDTARS - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse

So Do & So Don't & Some Simply Tel-A-Mon !
- - - doh de, Doh De. DOH DOH !

And Bryant thinks he can just waltz in here and win. Well he has another
thing coming.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Jan 30, 7:25*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,





*RHF wrote:
On Jan 30, 6:37*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
*Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
news:telamon_spamshield-
As I said before, those who participate in the radio ratings, year
after
year, thousands after thousands just in your county, don't find what
you
consider to be listenable to be that, and they don't listen in
droves.
Those thousands and thousands of people don't exist. None listen of
them
listen to *my* [emphasis added] radio. Now if you want to draw some
false
conclusions based
on some marketing data about what is or is not listenable on *my*
[emphasis added] radio
you go right ahead and continue to live in your fantasy world.
The world of commercial radio is based on ratings, not "the ability to
hear"
a station. There is no fantasy involved. Each person in the sample
represents a thousand or so non-participants, and the results are the
basis
for the revenue of each significant station. The fact is, there is
pretty
much no listening to stations as shown in the ratings all over the US
when
signals are not extremely strong and noise-free

That has nothing to do with *my* [emphasis added] radio reception.

Well, you are absolutely correct. It indeed has nothing to do with
*your* radio reception. But then again, that wasn't the topic, now was
it?

It may not have been the original topic but that was the discussion
between Eduardo and I. I don't see where you think it's OK to butt in.

Surveys, ratings and polls aren't based on *your* reception (which
you mentioned three times above). I know you find it hard to believe
that the sun doesn't rise and set on *YOU*, but please, try to get that
massive ego under control.

Yeah that's the point but I don't expect you to get the point. It's OK
not to get it. I don't want you to strain yourself.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Jan 30, 6:29 pm, wrote:
-
- You wouldn't want pieces of that satellite junk falling
- on your home, your yard, would you?
- I don't want that crap falling on mine either.
- cuhulin
-

Telamon,

Lets See You Are Having A 'Private' Discourse in a Newsgroup.
IDTARS -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse

So Do & So Don't & Some Simply Tel-A-Mon !
- - - doh de, Doh De. DOH DOH !

And Bryant thinks he can just waltz in here and win. Well he has another
thing coming.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


OMG - El Telemundo !

Are You Now the Self-A-Pointed "Gate-Keeper" {Cone-Head}
for the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_my_God
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemundo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeper
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekee...mmunication%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conehead

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I can't think of a ng that has more off-topic posts. As a DXer with over
2200 veries and 87 countries,

Prove it. Post all your QSLs on the internet, notarized.

They have been verified by sight by veteran DXer Ed Krejny of the NRC, and
were shown... alll of them... at the NRC convention in Denver in '63.

Prove it. Post all your QSLs on the internet, notarized.

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
I remember something about you saying you'd not be caught dead in
Michigan!

I actually sold my half of a property in Omena to my sister... No
interest
at all.


Interesting. Seems to be a theme with you and your family.

Hey, here's an idea! Maybe I could meet his *sister* at the *property*
this
summer and show her the QSL's!

You know, I was just thinking that very thing.

I have not been there in 20 years or more. It's boring.

So? What does that have to do with meeting your *sister* at the *property* this
summer and showing her the QSL's?

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
...
On Jan 30, 11:11 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:


BS

Lol. Is that the best you can do, troll? Thanks for making us laugh.

I am just imitating the guy from Holland who thinks Dutch Courage is a
military term.

Coming from a guy who imitates a Hispanic that's pretty darn funny!

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I can't think of a ng that has more off-topic posts. As a DXer with over
2200 veries and 87 countries,

Prove it. Post all your QSLs on the internet, notarized.

They have been verified by sight by veteran DXer Ed Krejny of the NRC, and
were shown... alll of them... at the NRC convention in Denver in '63.

Wow! 1963! You sure were busy that year. And, that was in your pre-Hispanic
period, wasn't it?