On Mar 8, 6:43*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
-
- From Aerospaceweb.org on the subject of F-102, and G. W. Bush.
-*http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ry/q0185.shtml
-

OK - So those are Two "Criteria" for 'being' President :

1 - Can Fly an Aircraft {George "W" Bush}
- - - = = = O R = = = - - -
2 - Serviced in Vietnam {John 'ff' Kerry}

So here are the three major Presidential Candidates in 2008.

A - Hillary Rodham Clinton = HRH = Her Royal Clintoness
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.

B - Barack "Hussein" Obama Jr. (BHO)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
0 = Can't Fly an Aircraft
0 = Never Went to Vietnam.
Oops... I mentioned his Middle Name "Hussein" :
So Now You All can call me a Racist and Anti-Islamic.

C - John Sidney McCain III (JSM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
+1 = Can Fly an Aircraft
+1 = Went to Vietnam

Clearly We All Know Who Should Be The
Next US President : Based On This Criteria.

just for the fun of it ~ RHF

2nd Roswell Crash Found by Archeologist in 1947. www.rense.com

Art Bell and George Noory will be having orgasims with each other over
that lieing article.

I was living in Martisnville,Indiana in 1947.I didn't see any stinking
phoney ufos.
cuhulin

dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.

Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.


Dan Rather?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

dave wrote:

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only

Rather was set up.

By whom, himself?

This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

Show us the evidence.

Dan Rather if you ''rather''.I rather NOT.Dan Rather, y'all can read his
stuff over yonder at, www.hd.net

I have to give Dan Rather some kind of credit though, he likes Railroads
and Railroad Trains.I figure he can't be all bad.Dan, sing us that there
Railroad song again like you did a bunch of years ago on the David
Letteman show.
cuhulin, the Railroad

Come awayyyy with me Lucille,,,, in my merry Oldsmobileeeee,,,,,
cuhulin, the Car

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only
Rather was set up.

By whom, himself?

This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

Show us the evidence.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

dave wrote:

clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
dxAce wrote:
clifto wrote:
dave wrote:
We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars training that ****head and he
goes AWOL. Real admirable, ****wad.
That's a pretty nasty accusation that's been disproven years ago.
Indeed.

Prove it
or admit you're a liar.
Yes, ol' Rickets is a liar.
Pretty shallow lie, too. Even the hard-core lefties admit that that lie was
so transparent that even Dan Rather couldn't pull it off.

Dan Rather?
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/webl...try=12526&only
Rather was set up.

By whom, himself?

This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

Show us the evidence.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

No evidence there of being AWOL.

Try again, Druggie!

That's my problem.Them wimmins want to see my ''evidence'' If they can
find my little piece of thimble size ''evidence'' I wish them the Luck
O' the Irish.
cuhulin