Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house media
pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar to how
Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better than your
retarded brother, David Rickets.

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:56:42 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house
media pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar
to how Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better
than your retarded brother, David Rickets.

The proof was already presented. From multiple prospectives even. The
real issue is that you have chosen to believe the "controlled" media
inspite of the fact of the other evidence and also the lack of evidence
(where was he during this time?).

Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:56:42 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.

I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house
media pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar
to how Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?

OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better
than your retarded brother, David Rickets.

The proof was already presented. From multiple prospectives even. The
real issue is that you have chosen to believe the "controlled" media
inspite of the fact of the other evidence and also the lack of evidence
(where was he during this time?).

Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to
make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server
as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to
make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server
as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.
Definitely not one of the millionaire republicants. Must be one of the
others....

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general

In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.
Definitely not one of the millionaire republicants. Must be one of the
others....

Others? Obviously you're just a retard boy who failed as a corporate manager.

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Bernard Peters wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:35:35 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

snip
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his
inability as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability
to make intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had
server as a pilot in the AF.
Inability as a corporate manager?
His companies and team franchise fail or performed poorly. In general
In general, you're a retard boy. Get ready to board the short bus in the
morning!

exactly the response I should have expected. No brains for an argument.



And yet, you, yourself have only presented gratuitous assertions.
Which, by the rules of logic, may be gratuitously denied.


Present some supporting information, and you may find an entirely
different level of discussion.


But by your own language, you have provided precisely the assertions
expected. Suggesting precious little grey matter for an argument,
yourself.


Do have a nice, though, apparently, agitated day.

dxAce wrote:
Bernard Peters wrote:
Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

Inability as a corporate manager?

He's making **** up. Notice he also referred to poor performance as prexy.

--
If only there was a Republican running for President of the United States.

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:56:42 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.
I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house
media pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar
to how Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?
OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better
than your retarded brother, David Rickets.
The proof was already presented. From multiple prospectives even. The
real issue is that you have chosen to believe the "controlled" media
inspite of the fact of the other evidence and also the lack of evidence
(where was he during this time?).

Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

dxAce wrote:

Inability as a corporate manager?

Please recall that he severely bungled and botched several of his
business ventures before he got into politics and was bailed out of the
mess by Daddy's Saudi Arabian friends. Look it up.

How quickly we forget...