Billy Burpelson wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:56:42 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:52:27 -0700, dave wrote:

Rather was set up. This removed "AWOL Bush" as an issue; even
though there's plenty of evidence beside the 60 Minutes fake letter.
I concur.
The only reason none of the other media don't follow this line is that
all were threatened with loosing access to the Pres and white house
media pool. The republicants management of the media is pretty similar
to how Putin managed the media. The question is, who learned from whom?
OK, you post the 'proof'. See if you can come up with something better
than your retarded brother, David Rickets.
The proof was already presented. From multiple prospectives even. The
real issue is that you have chosen to believe the "controlled" media
inspite of the fact of the other evidence and also the lack of evidence
(where was he during this time?).

Concluding, Bush's record poor performance as president and his inability
as a corporate manager is example enough of his inability to make
intelligent decisions that one would have gained if he had server as a
pilot in the AF.

dxAce wrote:

Inability as a corporate manager?

Please recall that he severely bungled and botched several of his
business ventures before he got into politics and was bailed out of the
mess by Daddy's Saudi Arabian friends. Look it up.

How quickly we forget...

That's fine Billy, but please post the proof that G.W. was AWOL...

Let me turn on my Radio and listen to what JT and Dave are saying on
www.supertalkms.com Radio.Sometimes, JT and Dave are on WLBT
www.wlbt.com tb mid day Radio tb.Tell Those eggheads, I say JT and
Dave, SUCK!!!!!.email, phone them and tell them Larry in
Jackson,Mississippi says so.Tell that stupid asshole Paul Gallo asshole
at Supelalkms, old Larry says he SUCKS too.
cuhulin

dxAce wrote:

Inability as a corporate manager?

Billy wrote:

Please recall that he severely bungled and botched several of his
business ventures before he got into politics and was bailed out of the
mess by Daddy's Saudi Arabian friends. Look it up.

How quickly we forget...

dxAce wrote:

That's fine Billy, but please post the proof that G.W. was AWOL...

Why?

Not my topic to defend. YOU questioned his ability as a corporate
manager. (see -your- question above) I responded to THAT question...let
the OP defend -his- statements.

www.usvetdsp.com

The only ''thingys'' I have a ''hard on'' for are those wimmins in my
Playboy magazines.
cuhulin

Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:

Inability as a corporate manager?

Billy wrote:

Please recall that he severely bungled and botched several of his
business ventures before he got into politics and was bailed out of the
mess by Daddy's Saudi Arabian friends. Look it up.

How quickly we forget...

dxAce wrote:

That's fine Billy, but please post the proof that G.W. was AWOL...

Why?

Not my topic to defend. YOU questioned his ability as a corporate
manager. (see -your- question above) I responded to THAT question...let
the OP defend -his- statements.

I see, you're just changing the subject and hoping everyone will follow you
away from the topic that hurts.

--
Iran tells us what the mainstream media won't:
"A new opinion poll suggests that over 54 percent of Americans do not trust
mainstream media and consider news websites more reliable."
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=46837&sectionid=3510203

Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Inability as a corporate manager?
Billy wrote:

Please recall that he severely bungled and botched several of his
business ventures before he got into politics and was bailed out of the
mess by Daddy's Saudi Arabian friends. Look it up.

How quickly we forget...
dxAce wrote:

That's fine Billy, but please post the proof that G.W. was AWOL...
Why?

Not my topic to defend. YOU questioned his ability as a corporate
manager. (see -your- question above) I responded to THAT question...let
the OP defend -his- statements.

clifto wrote:

I see, you're just changing the subject and hoping everyone will follow you
away from the topic that hurts.

Again, what part of the post don't you understand??? I'm not changing
the subject at all.

It's really very simple...Steve *specifically* asked about W's
"inability as a corporate manager". I specifically addressed *his
specific question*. I leave it up to the *original poster* to defend
-his- AWOL statement.

Please pay attention and please try and get your IQ up to room temperature.

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Inability as a corporate manager?
Billy wrote:

Please recall that he severely bungled and botched several of his
business ventures before he got into politics and was bailed out of the
mess by Daddy's Saudi Arabian friends. Look it up.

How quickly we forget...
dxAce wrote:

That's fine Billy, but please post the proof that G.W. was AWOL...
Why?

Not my topic to defend. YOU questioned his ability as a corporate
manager. (see -your- question above) I responded to THAT question...let
the OP defend -his- statements.

clifto wrote:

I see, you're just changing the subject and hoping everyone will follow you
away from the topic that hurts.

Again, what part of the post don't you understand??? I'm not changing
the subject at all.

It's really very simple...Steve *specifically* asked about W's
"inability as a corporate manager". I specifically addressed *his
specific question*. I leave it up to the *original poster* to defend
-his- AWOL statement.

Please pay attention and please try and get your IQ up to room temperature.

I know you are a dim bulb but I never expected you to call yourself
stupid.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California