Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Joe Analssandrini wrote: Dear "Telamon," After all these years - I still find it incredible that many radio hobbyists do not realize that the antenna is more important than the radio! The radio receiver does not actually receive the signal it discriminates and demodulates. The antenna does the receiving. Some radios have the antenna built in and in that case they are actually a receiving system. The built in antenna could be a whip or a ferrite bar antenna but most radios considered here need an external antenna or would benefit from one. Here, if your requirements are easy, the antenna does not take much in money or time to acquire or make respectively. If you should be more demanding than going for the evening big guns then the antenna will require more money and time. Skimp here and you will just get lousy performance out of the radio no matter what it cost. That's the word from rec.radio.shortwave. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wellbrook question | Shortwave | |||
More on the Wellbrook loops | Shortwave | |||
FA: Wellbrook K9AY | Shortwave | |||
Wellbrook | Shortwave | |||
Wellbrook ALA 330S on MW | Shortwave |