Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHD Radio farce
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I do not believe any radio in production is addressable. . Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this forum. Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words, there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the near future. ROFLMAO. Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data. "Services that could be made possible through RadioGuard include pay-per-listen options for live concerts or other events, improved reading services for the blind, private channels for emergency services, and free opt-in events sponsored by advertisers. So HD Radio will not just be competing with satellite radio for listening time, but soon will be competing for subscription dollars as well." iBiquity themselves are proving you're not as intimately connected as you claim. Which make your arguments shilling HD are largely irrelevant, as either mis- or dis- information. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of the HD Radio farce
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I do not believe any radio in production is addressable. . Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this forum. Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words, there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the near future. ROFLMAO. Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data. I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital. iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact. It's the FCC that has spoken of an all digital world. I don't know of a single person in radio who wants this today. "Services that could be made possible through RadioGuard include pay-per-listen options for live concerts or other events, improved reading services for the blind, private channels for emergency services, and free opt-in events sponsored by advertisers. So HD Radio will not just be competing with satellite radio for listening time, but soon will be competing for subscription dollars as well." "Could" means the sytem can be designed in the future to do such things. So far, there is no broadcaster interest, as things like FMeXtra are more attractive options and compatible with HD. iBiquity themselves are proving you're not as intimately connected as you claim. Which make your arguments shilling HD are largely irrelevant, as either mis- or dis- information. The system, the chips, the radios, the transmitters are all incompatible which subscription services today. iBiquity can tell us that they can make transmitters fly and oink like pigs, but unless we, the broadcasters, want it, it will not be implemented. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHD Radio farce
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I do not believe any radio in production is addressable. . Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this forum. Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words, there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the near future. ROFLMAO. Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data. I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital. iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact. Then you have exposed yourself as a fraud, Brother. iBiquity has stated their goal was to make broadcasting all digital in their first press release, and in damned near every appearance by Struble since. If you're not aware of that, then you're not who, or what, you claim. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of the HD Radio farce
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I do not believe any radio in production is addressable. . Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this forum. Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words, there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the near future. ROFLMAO. Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data. I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital. iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact. Then you have exposed yourself as a fraud, Brother. iBiquity has stated their goal was to make broadcasting all digital in their first press release, and in damned near every appearance by Struble since. If you're not aware of that, then you're not who, or what, you claim. Anyone knows that pure digital is a decade away, if ever, on FM. And a decade from now AM will likely not exist as we know it. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHD Radio farce
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I do not believe any radio in production is addressable. . Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this forum. Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words, there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the near future. ROFLMAO. Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data. I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital. iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact. Then you have exposed yourself as a fraud, Brother. iBiquity has stated their goal was to make broadcasting all digital in their first press release, and in damned near every appearance by Struble since. If you're not aware of that, then you're not who, or what, you claim. Anyone knows that pure digital is a decade away, if ever, on FM. And a decade from now AM will likely not exist as we know it. Once again, not the conversation at hand. You really do act more like a shill, every day. Not really addressing the point, but changing the subject to assert not that it's not happening, but that it's not happening NOW. Your way of saying that we should acceed to this strategy because the undesireable outcome is a decade away. LOL!. You have exposed yourself for what you really are, David. And, in the process, what you really are not. Have a good evening. p Admitting, |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHDRadio farce
D Peter Maus wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news Frank Dresser wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... [snip] Is that would be the vaporware chip-set and the BS software? Oh, set us straight on the details with some links please. It would seem, in the HD radio biz, that no plan happens until it happens. From about a year ago: "RadioGuard-capable radio receivers are planned to be introduced to the market by the holidays." http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/ibiquity-to-int.html Frank Dresser Not also, in direct conflict to David's denial, that the conditional access specifically includes subscription access to audio content. I've never heard of pay per program or pay per channel propositions; That's false on it's face. We discussed them here. I fact, Frank was the one who came up with the information that testing was underway, and you acknowledged that he was correct. And here, iBiquity's own sources are admitting that program test is underway. Now, you claim to have all this inside information about HD. And here iBiquity is openly discussig conditional access and subscription programming for HD. Yet, you've not heard of it? How is it you have all the details on upcoming technology from vendors, but have no idea about iBiquity's own testing projects? C'mon, David...either you're an informed broadcaster or your not. Either way, you're not telling the truth about something That's our 'Eduardo'! |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHDRadio farce
dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news Frank Dresser wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... [snip] Is that would be the vaporware chip-set and the BS software? Oh, set us straight on the details with some links please. It would seem, in the HD radio biz, that no plan happens until it happens. From about a year ago: "RadioGuard-capable radio receivers are planned to be introduced to the market by the holidays." http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/ibiquity-to-int.html Frank Dresser Not also, in direct conflict to David's denial, that the conditional access specifically includes subscription access to audio content. I've never heard of pay per program or pay per channel propositions; That's false on it's face. We discussed them here. I fact, Frank was the one who came up with the information that testing was underway, and you acknowledged that he was correct. And here, iBiquity's own sources are admitting that program test is underway. Now, you claim to have all this inside information about HD. And here iBiquity is openly discussig conditional access and subscription programming for HD. Yet, you've not heard of it? How is it you have all the details on upcoming technology from vendors, but have no idea about iBiquity's own testing projects? C'mon, David...either you're an informed broadcaster or your not. Either way, you're not telling the truth about something That's our 'Eduardo'! No kidding. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of the HD Radio farce
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Anyone knows that pure digital is a decade away, if ever, on FM. And a decade from now AM will likely not exist as we know it. Once again, not the conversation at hand. Of course it is. It's all about the ability to predict the future. Let's say that BMW does a press conference about the new 1 series, and a dumb journalist asks if the 1 will fit in the Space Shuttle. The BMW guy, spotting a promotional opportunity, says that they will test the fit... and later announces that, indeed, the 1 series BMW will fit in the Space Shuttle. Of course, there is no useful purpose in putting a car in orbit, so we don't hear any more about this. BMW got some press, though. The same thing applies to paid or lockied services via HD. There is no business model for paid programming (defined as audio, whether originally digital, analog or pig grunts) on individual HD channels. There are better and cheaper was of providing non-program data streams, like traffic infor. So there is no demand for either locked progrmming or data. But there is the ability to provide same, and iBiquity got some publicity out of this... it made you pay attention, didn't it? You really do act more like a shill, every day. Not really addressing the point, but changing the subject to assert not that it's not happening, but that it's not happening NOW. Your way of saying that we should acceed to this strategy because the undesireable outcome is a decade away. A shill is someone paid to hawk something. I don't qualify. I do, however, have an interest in putting free radio into all and any new distribution channels, and HD is one of them. So are WiMax and related technologies, and unless radio gets into all of them, they run the risk of not having a position in the next new standard of delivery. And that is because it is certain that AM has a finite and relatively short life and FM will last longer, but divided with other delivery methods. My interests are based on the future of radio, unlinked to the distribution. I hope HD works, but I also hope the industry covers all other bases too. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of theHD Radio farce
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Anyone knows that pure digital is a decade away, if ever, on FM. And a decade from now AM will likely not exist as we know it. Once again, not the conversation at hand. Of course it is. It's all about the ability to predict the future. No. It's not. It's about you claiming one thing. iBiquity saying that you're wrong. It's about you saying you've not heard of conditional access programming on HD and you having participated in a conversation a year ago in this very forum where it was presented in iBiquity's own announcement that conditional access programming was under test. It's about YOU claiming to have trade secret, proprietary information about HD technology, from third party producers, and yet being unaware of iBiquity's own stated intentions and current projects under test for the technology. Bottom line: It's NOT about the ability to predict the future. This conversation has been about what's going on RIGHT NOW. And in that, so far, by your own statements in conflict with iBiquity's own words, you've not been telling the truth. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of the HD Radio farce
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Anyone knows that pure digital is a decade away, if ever, on FM. And a decade from now AM will likely not exist as we know it. Once again, not the conversation at hand. Of course it is. It's all about the ability to predict the future. Let's say that BMW does a press conference about the new 1 series, and a dumb journalist asks if the 1 will fit in the Space Shuttle. The BMW guy, spotting a promotional opportunity, says that they will test the fit... and later announces that, indeed, the 1 series BMW will fit in the Space Shuttle. Of course, there is no useful purpose in putting a car in orbit, so we don't hear any more about this. BMW got some press, though. SNIP Well that settles it. Your posts belong in orbit along with the BMW. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Q for Eduardo - Does Arbitron monitor non-commercial? | Shortwave | |||
"Study: HD Radio's 'Tepid Growth Story'" - Ha! Ha! Eduardo & RHF! | Shortwave | |||
arbitron summaries | Broadcasting |