Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
David Frackelton Gleason, whilst posing as 'Eduardo', shipped out another load when he wrote: "gallant17" wrote in message ... Actually, radio stocks are down at least 50%, and some are down 90%. This goes to show that with iPods, cell phones, etc the long-term outlook for radio is grim. Stock price often has little to do with a business and more to do with market trends and hot and cold sectors. I'm going to retire enjoyable due to buying "value stocks" which are simply companies throwing off lots of cash and paying dividends which are undervalued by various metrics. Didn't you say sometime back that you'd have to keep working due to the fact that radio firms didn't have much of a pension plan? Something along the lines of being 70 years old or so? Radio wasn't very big on pension or thrift plans, as a rule, but they do exist. And after the mid 80's, for executives with a specified time in service, profit sharing, thrift and pension plans became more common among very large firms. And they exist with different plans for different levels of service, or rank within the company. I had both a 401k and a company pension plan when I exited the business, in addition to my portfoli, and my own financial plan for retirement. Generally, front line employees, like disk jockeys, and support staff like banner hangers, don't last long enough to have much in the way of vested interest in company assets and plans, so, for most, in radio, there are no pensions. Then, again, if you really do well in Radio, you don't need a company pension...you've covered that on your own. My own plan was far better than any company offerings in which I was vested. I simply cashed out my company plans when I exited, because my own plans were so much better. "retire enjoyable" at 70 or so doesn't seem too enjoyable. Or is this merely another shipment of your BS? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|