Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

Always comes down to money and status with you.
What ARE you compensating for?


Probably the same thing that the guy who keeps advertising his Rolex is.

You know the one. Every time he gets a tax refund, it's posted here.
Every time he gets a 'royalty' cheque, it's posted here. Whenever he
makes money on the stock market, he posts it here. He even posted about
his last insurance claim settlement. Let's not forget the money he made
on the sale of a guitar some time back. He posted about that too. Oh,
there is also the matter of huge amount the government pays him yearly
for being 'sick'. He posts about that too.

Now, if what Eduardo is doing seems like compensation to you, how does
Lare look in comparison?


mike



--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

In article ynJ2k.205$sg6.60@edtnps91, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

You should believe in honesty and being forthright and have a desire not
to live amongst criminals or cater to them.




Why do you think he stayed out of Washington?

There are more criminals where he lives in LA.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


Which I used to spend several years on the Dean's list at ASU, a slightly
better known university and from which I was plucked by the most
respected
headhunter in the broadcast business to rebuild a broadcast subsidiary
for a
NYSE listed company which made me an officer and division VP.

Yet, you do not have a degree.


I don't need a degree. Why I have been hired for the last 40 years or so has
to do with the fact that I help create top rated, money making radio
stations. No degree confers that ability.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


Which I used to spend several years on the Dean's list at ASU, a slightly
better known university and from which I was plucked by the most
respected
headhunter in the broadcast business to rebuild a broadcast subsidiary
for a
NYSE listed company which made me an officer and division VP.

Yet, you do not have a degree.


I don't need a degree.

Easy to say, especially if you have none.

Why I have been hired for the last 40 years or so has
to do with the fact that I help create top rated, money making radio
stations. No degree confers that ability.

BS does!

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.

What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


I took sociology classes, and anthropology as well.. and, I actually got a
degree!

And I did not need one, and never have.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Always comes down to money and status with you.

The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market
size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing
wrong with that.

What ARE you compensating for?


I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does
everything possible to denigrate it.

You yourself denigrates it.

Best you pick lettuce (wash your hands first).

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.
When you don't have a valid argument, you always resort to threats. You
have done this several times before.


And when you don't have a valid argument, you resort to evasion, change
of subject, semantics, and/or pedantry. You do this alot.

Actually, I do not do this.




Actually, yes you do. Your posting history is rife with it.




The fact is that I do not condone illegal immigration, but do believe in
a program to convert long term illegal residents into legal ones.

So, the ones who have been illegal the longest, should be rewarded with
citizenship?

Yep, if they have roots and kids and family here, that is the humanitarian
thing to do. More than that, until recently it would be considered the
American thing to do.


How convenient. Come here squeeze out a pup, get a citizen. Nothing
earned.

No difference than an open boarder. Plus the benefit of a passle of
little ones. Great system. No penalties. No consequences for illegal
activity.

Yes, great system.






I also
believe that new regulations and enforcement should be put in place for
the future.

And what would you like to see embraced by those regulations and
enforcements.....

Tighter border control, a guest worker program, deportation of immigrant
criminals, etc.


You can't claim to support tighter border control and then support
amnesty for illegals who have their kids on our dime.

That one don't wash, Pancho.


And there we have change-of-suject. What's the matter, uncomfortable
admitting that Steve may actually have paid into the programs he claims?

Because of his attitude and definsiveness, I don't think he did.

I've been in this group as long as Steve Lare. Perhaps longer. What I've
not seen is him diverting attention by resorting to insults. He resorts to
insults in response to insults.

Tell that to the Canadians and other he routinely insults to divert
attention from a topic.

And here we go. "He hit me back first."

Lare was more than patient with anti-American cracks coming over
the border from Canada for months before he fired his first shot.

They don't like it....they can stop the anti-American crap. Their
choice.


You can't claim the high ground in the insult game. You've been more
than insulting, not only to Steve, but to all of us, since your first
appearance. You can't cry foul when your argument is 'He hit me back
first."

My first appearance with anything controversian was to suggest that the
dying AM band should be allowed to try anything it could to save itself...
in this case, HD. Unfortunately, over the intervening years, AM listening is
even lower, and many whole nations are eliminating it.
As for Steve's homophobia....well, I'm reasonably certain that he's not
afraid of anything. Let along homosexuals. Not believing in their
lifestyle is not a phobia. Not liking them as individuals is not a phobia.

Making gay sexual insults does generally indicate an irrational or
self-masking phobia.


Cop out, there, Pancho.

Making gay sexual insults in response to insults is neither
irrational, nor a self masking phobia.

Again, you can't take umbrage with the response, if you won't take
umbrage with the offense.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


I took sociology classes, and anthropology as well.. and, I actually got a
degree!

And I did not need one, and never have.

That's what all the non-graduates claim.

But hey, take pride in that GED.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

Calling someone "pancho" is, as I am sure you intended, an offensive
statement in any context.
Good. No more so than blaming DXers for the current state of
Broadcasting, but you go ahead and be offended, anyway.


I blame Dxers for not understanding the current state of radio. Big
difference. 50 years ago, DXers were allied with broadcasters and understood
them. Not so today... DXers are often even enemies.




Allies don't abandon. They have to be run off.

If DXer's don't like broadcasters, today, you have only broadcasters
to blame.

Dxers don't go from allies to enemies without a reason.

Again, you recognize the response, but not the offense. Typical.