Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!

You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.






If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That is about the highest range that can be sustained if you are
concerned
with inflation-indexed preservation of capital. Otherwise, your little
saviings account will be reduced to about the equivalent of $100 k in
about
6 to 8 years.

You live in some damn strange dream world, oh faux one!

You do not get the fact that you must grow the principal in excess of the
amount of inflation, or your money loses value. To take 3% out of an
investment account and not lose principal, you have to grow the account
by
something above 7%, which the market for the last 18 months has not done.

Unless you are in some fairly esoteric things like direct REIT
investments
or Canadian oil /gas trusts (with the horrible tax and accounting
problems
they bring) you are likely not getting 7% now.

You've not a clue as to what you're talking about, dropout!

So you are saying one or more of the following is true:

1. You can take more than 3% to 4% of savings and retain present value of
the capital (in other words, adjusted for inflation).
2. Inflation does not have to be accounted for in the ongoing worth of
capital.
3. You can make an inflation and tax adjusted 7% over the last 18 months

Which is it (or "are they") as you may have invented a new school of
economics.

One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
6 to 8 years.
Had you gone to school, graduated, etc., you might have actually learned
something. As it is (and was) you've faked everything!
Not really.

Which means, 'yes, really.'

Only in your mind with your absurd contention that I am supporting PPM from
Arbitron.



Read again, Pancho. You missed the point.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no
longer wanted
you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap.
I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors.
How so?

You
will be much happier once you accept the stature of your station in
life.
My station is pretty damn good.

I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole.


For a man who endorses illegal immigrants sucking up the resources of a
nation into which they were never invited, you got a damned lot of nerve
commenting on a legal citizen's retirement.

I do not believe in illegal immigration, and believe there should be
controls as well as enforcement. However, those here with no criminal record
should have a path to residency, particularly if they have children born or
naturalized here.

As a citizen, I have a right to that opinion, and I have the right to
suspect that Steve Lare is somehow scamming the government and me, as a
taxpayer.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...


I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!

You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.


If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no
longer wanted
you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap.
I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors.
How so?

You
will be much happier once you accept the stature of your station in
life.
My station is pretty damn good.

I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole.


For a man who endorses illegal immigrants sucking up the resources of a
nation into which they were never invited, you got a damned lot of nerve
commenting on a legal citizen's retirement.

I do not believe in illegal immigration, and believe there should be
controls as well as enforcement. However, those here with no criminal record
should have a path to residency, particularly if they have children born or
naturalized here.

As a citizen, I have a right to that opinion, and I have the right to
suspect that Steve Lare is somehow scamming the government and me, as a
taxpayer.

I've scammed no one.

I have medical evidence to back me up, available to anyone who would care to
view it.

You yourself have nothing it seems to back up your various claims.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no
longer wanted
you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap.
I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors.
How so?

You
will be much happier once you accept the stature of your station in
life.
My station is pretty damn good.
I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole.

For a man who endorses illegal immigrants sucking up the resources of a
nation into which they were never invited, you got a damned lot of nerve
commenting on a legal citizen's retirement.

I do not believe in illegal immigration, and believe there should be
controls as well as enforcement. However, those here with no criminal record
should have a path to residency, particularly if they have children born or
naturalized here.


So, you believe in amnesty for illegal immigration. Thanks for
clearing that up.


As a citizen, I have a right to that opinion, and I have the right to
suspect that Steve Lare is somehow scamming the government and me, as a
taxpayer.



You, taking the high ground in civic matters....

Pancho, you are quite the hoot.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!
You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.
If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!


Likely. But they will have image priorities that have to be attended
to.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

I get over $2200 a month, plus whatever I can make off the $240,000 I
saved up
over the years.

I'm comfortable!
You have low standards. That sounds like near poverty to me.

3% to 4% on a quarter of a buck is not even $750 a month.
If his house is paid for, he actually needs very little money to live
surprisingly well.

What business is it of yours, anyway? You have your financial
profile. He has his. If he's living the life of his choosing, then butt
the **** out. By definition, he's living well.

Your evaluation of his living standards, based merely on perceived
income is the height of affectation.

Let's see....you countenance illegal immigration. You are an
accessory to violation of the immigration laws, you disrespect Unions,
you call those on disability as 'on the dole, and you are the very soul
of haughty pretensiousness.

DAMN, brother, Univision must be proud to have you invoking their name.

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

'Headquarters' is probably as clueless as he is!


Likely. But they will have image priorities that have to be attended
to.

That's the corporate way!

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

When you don't have a valid argument, you always resort to threats. You have
done this several times before.

The fact is that I do not condone illegal immigration, but do believe in a
program to convert long term illegal residents into legal ones. I also
believe that new regulations and enforcement should be put in place for the
future.

In other jobs, the restrictions from union work rules has made
competitiveness, innovation and technical advancement suffer. I have seen
the same in many US industries, which have fled out of necessity to other
nations.

As to Mr. Lare, his comments to others and to me convinces me that he is a
subsistence level misanthrope who tries to divert attention from himself by
insulting others. And that's without analyzing his overt homophobia, which
surely masks an even darker side to his personality.