Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you
with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings
about immigration topics.
As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as
you'd have
us believe.

I'm far from alone, here.

The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal
immigrants.
There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees
needed
to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would
paralyze
the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary
situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current
unemployment rate
is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the
unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will
not work
and those who are in the wrong place for getting work.

Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will
simply
cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be
paralyzed.
BS

On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We
essentially
told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to
enforce
existing laws.
What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo?

So in came enough people to equal the total populations of
Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them.
Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have
generally
been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees
in a
developed economy.

So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are
significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth.
That can be changed.

Yet we want to
send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family
has been
here, in some cases, for decades.
They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's
the problem?

Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an
opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They
are a
vital part of the nation and the economy.
Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement!


I'll gas up the Envoy. You want to ride shotgun?

Road trip!




I'll bring the SW-8.


Or how about this: I've got the iPod wired into the radio. What's
the drive from here...20 hours...I could download a drive full of
podcasts, as we could make him sit an listen to Mark Levin all the way
down.


Eh?

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

And thank you, again, for proving my point, Mike. At this rate
we'll be sharing a prize.

m II wrote:

Forgive my ignorance, I have no idea of what you are talking about or in
what context you are interpreting my postings.

Please have the last word, I am leaving this confusing exchange.


mike

Interesting that you should note that, mike. His responses to you are
quite similar in nature to the ones he gave me in our "Made in America"
thread.

DP, when cornered, seems to give cryptic, confusing and out of context
responses. Good if he is trying out for a 'spin doctor' job, but not
very conducive to an intelligent debate.

I don't know DP at all, but someone who apparently knew him well in the
old days previously posted that his personality has changed. Maybe so.
Possibly arteriosclerosis in the brain; maybe an ultrasound scan of his
carotid arteries would be in order.

P.S.
The above is not meant as a slam. It's just that it's always a good idea
to take care of your body, especially as we age.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


To quote Barry O'Bongo: Si se puede!

Pack your bags, boy.



Gee, two of the worse racial slurs possible in one post. You sure are the
bigot of bigots.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you
with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings
about immigration topics.
As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as
you'd have
us believe.

I'm far from alone, here.

The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal
immigrants.
There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees
needed
to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would
paralyze
the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary
situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current
unemployment rate
is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the
unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will
not work
and those who are in the wrong place for getting work.

Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will
simply
cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be
paralyzed.
BS

On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We
essentially
told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to
enforce
existing laws.
What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo?

So in came enough people to equal the total populations of
Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them.
Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have
generally
been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees
in a
developed economy.

So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are
significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth.
That can be changed.

Yet we want to
send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family
has been
here, in some cases, for decades.
They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's
the problem?

Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an
opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They
are a
vital part of the nation and the economy.
Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement!


I'll gas up the Envoy. You want to ride shotgun?

Road trip!




I'll bring the SW-8.

Or how about this: I've got the iPod wired into the radio. What's
the drive from here...20 hours...I could download a drive full of
podcasts, as we could make him sit an listen to Mark Levin all the way
down.

Eh?

I don't know, though it might be fun to torture him!

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


To quote Barry O'Bongo: Si se puede!

Pack your bags, boy.



Gee, two of the worse racial slurs possible in one post. You sure are the
bigot of bigots.

And you are the pedant of pedantry!

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

And thank you, again, for proving my point, Mike. At this rate
we'll be sharing a prize.

m II wrote:

Forgive my ignorance, I have no idea of what you are talking about or in
what context you are interpreting my postings.

Please have the last word, I am leaving this confusing exchange.


mike

Interesting that you should note that, mike. His responses to you are
quite similar in nature to the ones he gave me in our "Made in America"
thread.

DP, when cornered, seems to give cryptic, confusing and out of context
responses. Good if he is trying out for a 'spin doctor' job, but not
very conducive to an intelligent debate.


Actually, it's a lot simpler than that. I don't repeat myself.
Especially, when what I post is still available to reread. If you take
something out of context, you'll get a reference to a previous posting.
But, of course, if you're not paying close enough attention to actually
read what I've written the first time, there's little reason to suggest
that you'll get it if I should post it a second or third time.

It's a common phenomenon in this culture to have to say something
three or four times for it to be heard once.

There's no point to discussing something in that mode. The chances of
getting from A to B are slim.

But that's your strategy, isn't it? Take things out of context,
paraphrase, one line from one post, two lines from another, and then
rebut the amalgam without every actually having to address what has been
said.

I'm always up for a good discussion. When you are as well, I'll be
glad to enjoin you. But I'm not going to repeat myself because it amuses
you.






I don't know DP at all, but someone who apparently knew him well in the
old days previously posted that his personality has changed. Maybe so.
Possibly arteriosclerosis in the brain; maybe an ultrasound scan of his
carotid arteries would be in order.



No, I just gave up Dr Pepper.

But as I said to Richards when he made the same suggestion, I'll be
glad to take your USEnet diagnosis to my physician for a consult.

I hope they allow conjugal visits.





P.S.
The above is not meant as a slam.


Yes, actually, it is. :)

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

dxAce wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
dxAce wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you
with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings
about immigration topics.
As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as
you'd have
us believe.

I'm far from alone, here.

The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal
immigrants.
There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees
needed
to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would
paralyze
the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary
situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current
unemployment rate
is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the
unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will
not work
and those who are in the wrong place for getting work.

Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will
simply
cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be
paralyzed.
BS

On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We
essentially
told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to
enforce
existing laws.
What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo?

So in came enough people to equal the total populations of
Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them.
Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have
generally
been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees
in a
developed economy.

So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are
significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth.
That can be changed.

Yet we want to
send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family
has been
here, in some cases, for decades.
They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's
the problem?

Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an
opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They
are a
vital part of the nation and the economy.
Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement!


I'll gas up the Envoy. You want to ride shotgun?
Road trip!



I'll bring the SW-8.
Or how about this: I've got the iPod wired into the radio. What's
the drive from here...20 hours...I could download a drive full of
podcasts, as we could make him sit an listen to Mark Levin all the way
down.

Eh?

I don't know, though it might be fun to torture him!





Let me see if I still have my waterboard. I had a 75 gallon tank
that mounted on the luggage rack.

You know, for weekends in the city when I was bored.

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

On Jun 8, 8:30*am, m II wrote:
RHF wrote:
He clearly in his best Broadcast Voice stated that he was :
Dudley Do-Right of the Mounties {RCMP} !

- Remember Crusader Rabbit?

That I Do That I Do ~ RHF

- Pretty much the same people produced it.

We're getting old.

mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

d'Eduardo : Legalization - By having the Illegal Alien Invaders from
 

On Jun 8, 9:43*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in ...

David Eduardo wrote:
I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your
"Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings
about immigration topics.
* As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have
us believe.

* I'm far from alone, here.

The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants..
There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed
to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze
the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary
situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate
is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the
unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work
and those who are in the wrong place for getting work.

Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply
cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be
paralyzed.

On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially
told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce
existing laws. So in came enough people to equal the total populations of
Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them.
Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally
been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a
developed economy.

So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are
significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth. Yet we want to
send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been
here, in some cases, for decades.

- Give those who have roots and who do not have
- any criminal records

If They Crossed the Border Illegally :
They Are Criminals and Invaders Too.

- an opportunity to become legal and eventually
- to become citizens.

d'Eduardo,

Legalization - By having the Illegal Alien Invaders from Mexico
Return to Mexico : They Become Instantly Legal :
As Mexican Citizens In Mexico !

what could be easier ~ RHF

- They are a vital part of the nation and the economy.

NO THEY ARE A DRAIN ON SOCIAL SERVICES AND
COST THE TAX PAYERS {CITIZENS} OF THE USA [.]

MOST WORK ILLEGALLY : IMPRISON THE EMPLOYERS

MOST PAY NO TAXES : TAX AND FINE THE EMPLOYERS

MOST COST THE US TAXPAYER MONEY : SEND THEM HOME

Eduardo - fellow IBOC-shill diputes your claims about AM ratings.
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


To quote Barry O'Bongo: Si se puede!

Pack your bags, boy.



Gee, two of the worse racial slurs possible in one post. You sure are the
bigot of bigots.

And you are the pedant of pedantry!


A mindless response which is not even a good insult does not take anything
away from your use of racial epithets and offences.