"ASCII" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

"ASCII" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
And KNX has less than a quarter of the KFI audience.

I'll bet that changes during an earthquake

Unlikely. Since earthquakes generally run less than 60 seconds, changing
station during them is improbable.


It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.

You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.

ASCII wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.

You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.

An earthquake event is considered to consist of a series of shocks
and after the initial one there are usually several aftershocks with the
interludes consisting of anxious people tuning to KNX.
I can see why so many people think you're such a nit picking jerk.

Look up the definition of the word 'pedant'.

Or better yet:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedant

Note the 'Usage of term' and the 'Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder'
sections.

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu, 05 Jun
2008 02:00:36 -0400, dxAce wrote: Begin



ASCII wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people
will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.

You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.

An earthquake event is considered to consist of a series of shocks
and after the initial one there are usually several aftershocks with the
interludes consisting of anxious people tuning to KNX.
I can see why so many people think you're such a nit picking jerk.

Look up the definition of the word 'pedant'.

Or better yet:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedant

Note the 'Usage of term' and the 'Obsessive-compulsive personality
disorder'
sections.


The more serious the threat to his credibility he perceives,
the more he goes into an OCD compensatory mode
until the vicious cycle eventually implodes.
Glad I'm not in LA,

That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and ratings, and
probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu, 05 Jun
2008 02:00:36 -0400, dxAce wrote: Begin



ASCII wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people
will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.

You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.

An earthquake event is considered to consist of a series of shocks
and after the initial one there are usually several aftershocks with the
interludes consisting of anxious people tuning to KNX.
I can see why so many people think you're such a nit picking jerk.

Look up the definition of the word 'pedant'.

Or better yet:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedant

Note the 'Usage of term' and the 'Obsessive-compulsive personality
disorder'
sections.


The more serious the threat to his credibility he perceives,
the more he goes into an OCD compensatory mode
until the vicious cycle eventually implodes.
Glad I'm not in LA,

That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and ratings, and
probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

Actually it explains just why you're a pedant, oh faux one.

Now go pretend that you own the Empire State Building.

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu, 05 Jun
2008 02:00:36 -0400, dxAce wrote: Begin


ASCII wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people
will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.
You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.
An earthquake event is considered to consist of a series of shocks
and after the initial one there are usually several aftershocks with the
interludes consisting of anxious people tuning to KNX.
I can see why so many people think you're such a nit picking jerk.
Look up the definition of the word 'pedant'.
I'd be trying to keep the 50" TV from falling over.

dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu, 05 Jun
2008 02:00:36 -0400, dxAce wrote: Begin


ASCII wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people
will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.
You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.
An earthquake event is considered to consist of a series of shocks
and after the initial one there are usually several aftershocks with the
interludes consisting of anxious people tuning to KNX.
I can see why so many people think you're such a nit picking jerk.
Look up the definition of the word 'pedant'.

Or better yet:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedant

Note the 'Usage of term' and the 'Obsessive-compulsive personality
disorder'
sections.

The more serious the threat to his credibility he perceives,
the more he goes into an OCD compensatory mode
until the vicious cycle eventually implodes.
Glad I'm not in LA,
That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and ratings, and
probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

Actually it explains just why you're a pedant, oh faux one.

Now go pretend that you own the Empire State Building.




ROFLMAO!

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu, 5
Jun 2008 05:17:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and ratings,
and
probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

First, I don't care about artificial 'ratings'

If you owned or worked at a radio station, they would be one of your primary
concerns.

and second I do understand and care about real phenomena.

If you think people tune in to the radio during an earthquake, I doubt even
that.

On Jun 5, 2:25*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Bart Bailey" wrote in message

...

In posted on Thu, 5
Jun 2008 05:17:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and ratings,
and
probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

First, I don't care about artificial 'ratings'

If you owned or worked at a radio station, they would be one of your primary
concerns.

and second I do understand and care about real phenomena.

- If you think people tune in to the radio during
- an earthquake, I doubt even that.

d'Eduardo,

Usually people will 'turn-on' the Radio or TV with 3 Minutes
of an Earth-Quake to Find Out "How Bad It Was". That is
provided they were not already listening to the Radio or TV
and the Power did not go OFF.

While the Earth Quake is Happening : The First Concern
is Personal Safety.

The the First Minute After is Checking on 'others'.

Followed-by checking on the Radio or TV to see . . .
"How Bad It Was".

~ RHF

"ASCII" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
It's the addled moments right after the shaking stops that people will
change stations, or even turn the radio on if it wasn't already,
whereas 'during' the event, they are likely trying to decide if they
should evacuate their structure or just hold onto something.

You said, "during an earthquake." And that is wrong.

An earthquake event is considered to consist of a series of shocks
and after the initial one there are usually several aftershocks with the
interludes consisting of anxious people tuning to KNX.
I can see why so many people think you're such a nit picking jerk.

An aftershock is a separate earthquake or temblor. It's a separate incident.

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu,
5 Jun 2008 05:15:35 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin


An aftershock is a separate earthquake or temblor. It's a separate
incident.

Then why are Northridge or Loma Prieta each
referred to as an earthquake (singular) instead of clusters?

The Northridge quake occurred at 4:31 AM on January 14, 1994. Everything
else was an aftershock.

Nether Northridge nor Loma Prieta were clusters. A cluster is a long
sequence of many similarly sized events that runs at about the same level
for many days and even weeks, such as the one last year centered around the
Southeastern end of the Salton Sea. Northridge was a major quake followed be
decreasing and smaller aftershocks where the average daily activity is on a
decline. Clusters often remain at comparable intensity and frequency levels
for many, many days.