LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 12:43 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default d'Eduardo : So your 'Answer' is that +20% of All Adult Radio

On Jun 5, 5:06*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

...
On Jun 5, 4:23 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
So your 'answer' is that 50% of All Adult Radio Listeners
Don't Count : Even When There Is A Public Safety Emergency.


Since they do not use AM radio (over 60% of Americans never use it) they
would not, in an emergency, think of AM as a place to get information. Most
would think of TV first, then, maybe if there was no power, grab a radio.

Dang d'Eduardo that sure sounds hostile to anyone
over the Age of 35 : Just because you can not make
a Profit off of Selling their Ears.

- Radio stations are a business, except for the limited
- number of NPR stations and the religious stations
- that are not commercial. If a station can not make
- money, it does not survive. Since, in the larger markets,
- they can not make any money serving 55+, radio can
- not cater to that segment.

Sure Sound Like An Extreme Case of Neglect and
Failure To Serve The Public Interest of the +20%
of the US Adult Pupolation over the Age of 55.

=IF= These were Hispanic Radio Listeners and they
simply made up 5% or more of any Local Community :
You would be Demanding Equal Rights to Serve Their
Needs as Non-English Radio Listeners. But You by
Your OWn Admmission Use Your Numbers to Actively
Discriminate Against The English Speaking Group of
Radio Listeners Over the Age of 55 which make up
more than 20% of the US Adult Population.

Sure Sound Like Their Is Some Sort of Civil Rights
Case in There for English Speaking Radio Listeners
Over the Age of 55 Against You and Your Licensed
Big Media Corpotations for Failing to Serve the Public
Interest of +20% of Your Communities.

d'eduardo - you are providing broadcaster answers
to radio listeners questions - that's a big d'oh ~ RHF
-ps- you are not 'connecting' with the readers here.

- No, I am explaining *to listeners how radio works
- and why things that seem odd or defy explanation
- are actually true and justifiable.
- *.

=REWRITE=
No, I am explaining to Radio listeners how The Business
Of radio works and why things that seem odd To A Radio
Listener or defy Reasonable explanation are actually true
To A Broadcaster and justifiable For Profit.

-translation- F*uck the Radio Listeners This Is A Business.
{ Where Broadcasters Own The Radio Lister's Ears. }
.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why haven't we heard from Eduardo, the master IBOC-shill? IBOCcrock Shortwave 22 April 17th 08 11:25 PM
Doug Myrland: man-woman IBOC-shill [email protected] Shortwave 7 December 17th 07 07:09 PM
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! IBOCcrock Shortwave 2 October 9th 07 06:20 PM
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! IBOCcrock Shortwave 0 October 9th 07 05:55 PM
NEW IBOC THREAD...Is Eduardo a profit? ve3... Shortwave 7 February 27th 07 07:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017