On Jun 6, 4:11*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

....





In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu,
5
Jun 2008 05:17:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

That explains why you have no clue as to local media usage and
ratings, and probably why you don't understand earthquakes.

First, I don't care about artificial 'ratings'

If you owned or worked at a radio station, they would be one of your
primary concerns.

and second I do understand and care about real phenomena.

If you think people tune in to the radio during an earthquake, I
doubt even that.

That is the most stupid thing you have posted yet.

Think about my statement again. People "tune in" _after_ and earthquake, not
during it. My point is that, unlike hurricanes or tornado situations or
floods, there is no advance warning for a quake, and not enough time during
a quake to tune in. Tune in occurs after the incident, not during it.

- In any case, most of the population does not use
- AM radio, mucho of it does not even know AM exists.

d'Eduardo it sounds like you are making a Clear Case
that AM/MW Radio as a Commercial Media is FAILING
to Promote Itself "TO" Radio Listeners "TO" Create
Awareness of AM.MW Radio as a 24/7 Source of News
and Information to Meet the Radio Listeners Needs.

[ What We Got Here Is A Failure To Communicate ]

{The Medium is the Message and the Message is the Medium}

-or- Are you really talking about the Illegal Spanish
Speaking Radio Listeners who would not be listening
to KNX and KFI in English anyway being Un-Aware
of Emergency News and Information in English on
Radio Stations Broadcasting in English -cause- It
Ain't In Spanish. D'Oh ! ~ RHF

- The first source of info is TV for most of the two
- youngest generations of Americans. Not AM radio.

After and Earth Quake and the Power Goes OUT
99% of the TV will Not Be Working
-while- An AM/FM Radio using Batteries will Be There
24/7 Ready To Go "In Case of Emergencies"
-again- A Case of AM/MW Radio Failing to Promote
Itself as the "Go To Media In Case of Emergencies".
-sounds like- There is a PSA in there somewhere.

~ RHF

"RHF" wrote in message
...
On Jun 6, 4:11 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
d'Eduardo it sounds like you are making a Clear Case
that AM/MW Radio as a Commercial Media is FAILING
to Promote Itself "TO" Radio Listeners "TO" Create
Awareness of AM.MW Radio as a 24/7 Source of News
and Information to Meet the Radio Listeners Needs.

That's the job of news stations via advertising and promotion... each
station is on their own in this regard. All music stations provide a
diffferent type of service than information services do.

And that is different from the issue that, whether on AM or FM, news
stations or traditional news and talk stations have just about zero appeal
to anyone under 35 or 40. AM, as a band, is only used by 40% of the
population, almost all of that being over the age of 45.

You can't promote AM to people who will not use it under any circumstance.

-or- Are you really talking about the Illegal Spanish
Speaking Radio Listeners who would not be listening
to KNX and KFI in English anyway being Un-Aware
of Emergency News and Information in English on
Radio Stations Broadcasting in English -cause- It
Ain't In Spanish. D'Oh ! ~ RHF

Emergencides are notified by the EAS system, which every station must relay.
Language makes no difference.

And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau can
not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all data is
based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE legal, this is
not a major issue.

- The first source of info is TV for most of the two
- youngest generations of Americans. Not AM radio.

After and Earth Quake and the Power Goes OUT
99% of the TV will Not Be Working
-while- An AM/FM Radio using Batteries will Be There
24/7 Ready To Go "In Case of Emergencies"
-again- A Case of AM/MW Radio Failing to Promote
Itself as the "Go To Media In Case of Emergencies".
-sounds like- There is a PSA in there somewhere.

~ RHF

Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau can
not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all data is
based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE legal, this is
not a major issue.

First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless,
then proceed to throw out your statistics.
Equally meaningless, no doubt.

Well, stop and think about it. If you can't know how many illegals
there are, you can't know how many legals there are.

That he quotes a figure for legals requires that he knows how many
are illegal. Since he openly admits he doesn't report illegal immigrants
in this country to INS, he's an accessory to a number of crimes.

Calling his claims and credibility into question, by exposing an
openly admitted lack of integrity.

On Jun 6, 11:01*am, D Peter Maus wrote:
Bart Bailey wrote:
In posted on Fri,
6 Jun 2008 05:42:09 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin *

And there is no way to quantify illegal aliens; even the Census Bureau can
not perform an exact ennumeration. They do not self-declare, so all data is
based on estimates, not counts. Since 80% of Hispanics ARE legal, this is
not a major issue.

First you disqualify any statistical reference as meaningless,
then proceed to throw out your statistics.
Equally meaningless, no doubt.

- Well, stop and think about it.
- If you can't know how many illegals there are,
- you can't know how many legals there are.

there are, -because- There Are. -unless- THERE AIN'T !

* *That he quotes a figure for legals requires that he knows how many
are illegal. Since he openly admits he doesn't report illegal immigrants
in this country to INS, he's an accessory to a number of crimes.

* *Calling his claims and credibility into question, by exposing an
openly admitted lack of integrity.