Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 6:11*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... m II wrote: dxAce wrote: Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no longer wanted you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap. I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors. How so? - - - - - You will be much happier once you accept - - - - - the stature of your station in life. - - - - My station is pretty damn good. - - - I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole. - - Nah, I get Social Security Disability (I paid into that), - - and I get my Union Pension (I paid into that), - - and I get my company pension (I paid into that). - The Social Security disability you did not pay into. D'Oh ! - d'Eduardo : Are You So Totally Lacking in Knowledge* About All-Things Social Security ? ? ? http://www.ssa.gov/disability/ * Hint {One-Word} "Insurance" Oh Now I Get It : It's and Over-the-Age of 55 Thing that Does Not Count In Your World. -ps- d'Eduardo All People Count : Even Us Senior Citizens. --pps-- Supplemental Security Income (SSI) d'Eduardo you should know all about this; It's what the USA gives out FREE to all Illegal Alien Invaders over the Age of 62 when they become Legal Aliens and the Senior Imported Family Members of Legalized Aliens : EVEN THOUGH THEY DID NOT PAY INTO THE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM FOR IT. - The thing you pay into is for retirement benefits at age 62 to 66. . D'Oh ! - Not - It's only one part of many. - Pensions are a product of company policies and - union demands and threats. TBD - Depends on the 'actual' Company and/or Union Pension Plan. - You, yourself, did not earn them sich as ? - present day workers earn the money - they put in their 401-k plans. That they do. - Whatever, it still sounds like very little money. Not Everyone is a d'Eduardo Living Large ! Keep blowing those beans out your sorry, un-american ass, boy. - It's likely my taxes that pay your benefits from the - government, as SSI and SS payments come from - general funds; it's not like they were separately kept - in special accounts. Actually at present the FICA Taxes are Greater then the Expenditures and so Your Taxes are Paying for Services to all your Illegal Alien Invader Friends. d'Eduardo - Care to Buy a "Locked Box" -no-need-to- Al Gore is Giving Them Away Filled with Carbon Credits and CO2 IOUs - such a deal ~ RHF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
On Jun 7, 6:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: - Pensions are a product of company policies and - union demands and threats. TBD - Depends on the 'actual' Company and/or Union Pension Plan. For instance, AFTRA takes a piece of the paycheck, in addition to regular Union dues, labelled: Health and Retirement Remittance. You pay into the Health and Retirement Funds Program. SAG has similar programs. The more you work, the more your pension. The Director's Guild also has a retirement program paid into by working members. Those are not 'company' programs. They're directly administered by the Union for workers in good standing. They do not apply to members who have declared 'financial core.' And they're in addition to any programs by the company, and/or SS. In an era where Union organization has taken some significant membership hits, such programs are inducements to stay with the Union rather than crossing to financial core. But such programs are not merely late developments. Unions have had pension plans for decades. Not all, certainly, but significant numbers of them. Enough that your declarations to the contrary are laughable. Someone working for/with the larger companies, especially in a state like California, would know all this. That you don't further exposes the weakness of your claims. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... RHF wrote: On Jun 7, 6:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: - Pensions are a product of company policies and - union demands and threats. Those are not 'company' programs. They're directly administered by the Union for workers in good standing. They do not apply to members who have declared 'financial core.' I think that is why RHF distinguised between company pensions and union ones. Many company pensions, such as those in the auto industry, are being moved to the unions as the auto companies and related suppliers can not pay them. They were created in the days when autos were so profitable (and fell apart in 3 years or less) and so immune from foreign competion that the car companies promised anything to avoid strikes. Wow, nobody can pay for any of it. And they're in addition to any programs by the company, and/or SS. Pensions can be part employee financed, or totally enployer financed. SS is an entitlement, and is based on, if I recall, the earned and taxed income from the last 15 years of work prior to retirement. Someone working for/with the larger companies, especially in a state like California, would know all this. California has few unionized workers by comparison to rust belt areas, and is a right to work state. That's why unions often have to fund their own pensions from dues, such as AFTRA and related film and entertainment unions do. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... RHF wrote: On Jun 7, 6:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: - Pensions are a product of company policies and - union demands and threats. Those are not 'company' programs. They're directly administered by the Union for workers in good standing. They do not apply to members who have declared 'financial core.' I think that is why RHF distinguised between company pensions and union ones. Many company pensions, such as those in the auto industry, are being moved to the unions as the auto companies and related suppliers can not pay them. They were created in the days when autos were so profitable (and fell apart in 3 years or less) and so immune from foreign competion that the car companies promised anything to avoid strikes. Wow, nobody can pay for any of it. And they're in addition to any programs by the company, and/or SS. Pensions can be part employee financed, or totally enployer financed. SS is an entitlement, and is based on, if I recall, the earned and taxed income from the last 15 years of work prior to retirement. Someone working for/with the larger companies, especially in a state like California, would know all this. California has few unionized workers by comparison to rust belt areas, and is a right to work state. That's why unions often have to fund their own pensions from dues, such as AFTRA and related film and entertainment unions do. Thanks for that pedantic diatribe! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... RHF wrote: On Jun 7, 6:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: - Pensions are a product of company policies and - union demands and threats. Those are not 'company' programs. They're directly administered by the Union for workers in good standing. They do not apply to members who have declared 'financial core.' I think that is why RHF distinguised between company pensions and union ones. Many company pensions, such as those in the auto industry, are being moved to the unions as the auto companies and related suppliers can not pay them. They were created in the days when autos were so profitable (and fell apart in 3 years or less) and so immune from foreign competion that the car companies promised anything to avoid strikes. Wow, nobody can pay for any of it. And they're in addition to any programs by the company, and/or SS. Pensions can be part employee financed, or totally enployer financed. SS is an entitlement, and is based on, if I recall, the earned and taxed income from the last 15 years of work prior to retirement. Someone working for/with the larger companies, especially in a state like California, would know all this. California has few unionized workers by comparison to rust belt areas, and is a right to work state. That's why unions often have to fund their own pensions from dues, such as AFTRA and related film and entertainment unions do. That's some whacky world you live in. Are you wrong about most things? The law of chance would give you 50% but you seem off base much more often than that. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:11:49 -0700, Telamon
wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... RHF wrote: On Jun 7, 6:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: - Pensions are a product of company policies and - union demands and threats. Those are not 'company' programs. They're directly administered by the Union for workers in good standing. They do not apply to members who have declared 'financial core.' I think that is why RHF distinguised between company pensions and union ones. Many company pensions, such as those in the auto industry, are being moved to the unions as the auto companies and related suppliers can not pay them. They were created in the days when autos were so profitable (and fell apart in 3 years or less) and so immune from foreign competion that the car companies promised anything to avoid strikes. Wow, nobody can pay for any of it. And they're in addition to any programs by the company, and/or SS. Pensions can be part employee financed, or totally enployer financed. SS is an entitlement, and is based on, if I recall, the earned and taxed income from the last 15 years of work prior to retirement. Someone working for/with the larger companies, especially in a state like California, would know all this. California has few unionized workers by comparison to rust belt areas, and is a right to work state. That's why unions often have to fund their own pensions from dues, such as AFTRA and related film and entertainment unions do. That's some whacky world you live in. Are you wrong about most things? The law of chance would give you 50% but you seem off base much more often than that. Probability is not linear...........at some point he may have a run in which he is right. Scary - huh? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why haven't we heard from Eduardo, the master IBOC-shill? | Shortwave | |||
Doug Myrland: man-woman IBOC-shill | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
NEW IBOC THREAD...Is Eduardo a profit? | Shortwave |