David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.
When you don't have a valid argument, you always resort to threats. You
have done this several times before.


And when you don't have a valid argument, you resort to evasion, change
of subject, semantics, and/or pedantry. You do this alot.

Actually, I do not do this.




Actually, yes you do. Your posting history is rife with it.




The fact is that I do not condone illegal immigration, but do believe in
a program to convert long term illegal residents into legal ones.

So, the ones who have been illegal the longest, should be rewarded with
citizenship?

Yep, if they have roots and kids and family here, that is the humanitarian
thing to do. More than that, until recently it would be considered the
American thing to do.


How convenient. Come here squeeze out a pup, get a citizen. Nothing
earned.

No difference than an open boarder. Plus the benefit of a passle of
little ones. Great system. No penalties. No consequences for illegal
activity.

Yes, great system.






I also
believe that new regulations and enforcement should be put in place for
the future.

And what would you like to see embraced by those regulations and
enforcements.....

Tighter border control, a guest worker program, deportation of immigrant
criminals, etc.


You can't claim to support tighter border control and then support
amnesty for illegals who have their kids on our dime.

That one don't wash, Pancho.


And there we have change-of-suject. What's the matter, uncomfortable
admitting that Steve may actually have paid into the programs he claims?

Because of his attitude and definsiveness, I don't think he did.

I've been in this group as long as Steve Lare. Perhaps longer. What I've
not seen is him diverting attention by resorting to insults. He resorts to
insults in response to insults.

Tell that to the Canadians and other he routinely insults to divert
attention from a topic.

And here we go. "He hit me back first."

Lare was more than patient with anti-American cracks coming over
the border from Canada for months before he fired his first shot.

They don't like it....they can stop the anti-American crap. Their
choice.


You can't claim the high ground in the insult game. You've been more
than insulting, not only to Steve, but to all of us, since your first
appearance. You can't cry foul when your argument is 'He hit me back
first."

My first appearance with anything controversian was to suggest that the
dying AM band should be allowed to try anything it could to save itself...
in this case, HD. Unfortunately, over the intervening years, AM listening is
even lower, and many whole nations are eliminating it.
As for Steve's homophobia....well, I'm reasonably certain that he's not
afraid of anything. Let along homosexuals. Not believing in their
lifestyle is not a phobia. Not liking them as individuals is not a phobia.

Making gay sexual insults does generally indicate an irrational or
self-masking phobia.


Cop out, there, Pancho.

Making gay sexual insults in response to insults is neither
irrational, nor a self masking phobia.

Again, you can't take umbrage with the response, if you won't take
umbrage with the offense.