Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Always comes down to money and status with you. The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing wrong with that. What ARE you compensating for? I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does everything possible to denigrate it. So, you're not here to participate...you're here to stir up noise. Got it. Your employer must be SO proud. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Always comes down to money and status with you. The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing wrong with that. What ARE you compensating for? I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does everything possible to denigrate it. So, you're not here to participate...you're here to stir up noise. Got it. Your employer must be SO proud. I doubt anyone's employer is very concerned about hobby or sports or any leisure time activities folks engage in, unless they find the gun club member is also sticking up 7-11's. I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your "Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about immigration topics. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Always comes down to money and status with you. The general measurements of success in radio _are_ money, ratings, market size, community service, good engineering practice, etc. There is nothing wrong with that. What ARE you compensating for? I'm having fun with people in a hobby that used to love radio and now does everything possible to denigrate it. So, you're not here to participate...you're here to stir up noise. Got it. Your employer must be SO proud. I doubt anyone's employer is very concerned about hobby or sports or any leisure time activities folks engage in, unless they find the gun club member is also sticking up 7-11's. I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your "Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about immigration topics. \ Good. Let them object. Let them ask my why. As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have us believe. I'm far from alone, here. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news ![]() David Eduardo wrote: I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your "Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about immigration topics. As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have us believe. I'm far from alone, here. The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants. There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work and those who are in the wrong place for getting work. Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce existing laws. So in came enough people to equal the total populations of Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them. Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a developed economy. So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth. Yet we want to send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been here, in some cases, for decades. Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They are a vital part of the nation and the economy. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news ![]() David Eduardo wrote: I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your "Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about immigration topics. As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have us believe. I'm far from alone, here. The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants. There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work and those who are in the wrong place for getting work. Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. BS On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce existing laws. What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo? So in came enough people to equal the total populations of Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them. Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a developed economy. So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth. That can be changed. Yet we want to send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been here, in some cases, for decades. They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's the problem? Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They are a vital part of the nation and the economy. Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news ![]() David Eduardo wrote: I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your "Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about immigration topics. As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have us believe. I'm far from alone, here. The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants. There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work and those who are in the wrong place for getting work. Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. BS On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce existing laws. What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo? So in came enough people to equal the total populations of Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them. Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a developed economy. So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth. That can be changed. Yet we want to send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been here, in some cases, for decades. They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's the problem? Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They are a vital part of the nation and the economy. Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement! I'll gas up the Envoy. You want to ride shotgun? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() D Peter Maus wrote: dxAce wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news ![]() I think they would be more likely to object to someone like you with your "Pancho" routine and way-out-there ways of expressing their feelings about immigration topics. As for my thoughts on immigration...not so far out there as you'd have us believe. I'm far from alone, here. The truth is that there is no way to remove most of the illegal immigrants. There are around 12 million, and they are the entry level employees needed to sustain the economy. Removing them, in the vast majority, would paralyze the economy and create a depression out of the current recessionary situation. Despite wild cries to the contrary, the current unemployment rate is very near the residual level below which a nation can never go; the unemployed consist significantly of those who can not work, will not work and those who are in the wrong place for getting work. Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. BS On the other hand, there was no enforcement for 30 years. We essentially told the world that it could come and slip in as we chose not to enforce existing laws. What's this 'WE' ****, 'Eduardo? So in came enough people to equal the total populations of Phoenix, San Diego, Atlanta and Dallas. Nobody really stopped them. Government did not care... in fact, the only ones who cared have generally been those who don't understand the need for entry level employees in a developed economy. So now we have parents who are illegal who have children who are significantly Americanized and who are Americans by birth. That can be changed. Yet we want to send them all back to Laos or Mexico or Romania after the family has been here, in some cases, for decades. They prosecute folks who committed murders decades ago.. so what's the problem? Give those who have roots and who do not have any criminal records an opportunity to become legal and eventually to become citizens. They are a vital part of the nation and the economy. Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement! I'll gas up the Envoy. You want to ride shotgun? Road trip! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. BS Start with huge sectors, from food processing and harvesting to the hospitality, facilities maintenance and sanitation industries, which would grind to a halt without such employees... Add the decrease in taxes. Let's say there are 3 million less occupied dwelling units no longer producing tax base revenue. No sales taxes from what is 4% of the population. Reduction of FICA payments. And the ripple effect on retail and other sectors of a 4% reduction of the economy. The disaster would be total, aside from the fact that logistically it can't be done. And the probability of disruptive things ranging from strikes to riots is huge. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. BS Start with huge sectors, from food processing and harvesting to the hospitality, facilities maintenance and sanitation industries, which would grind to a halt without such employees... Add the decrease in taxes. Let's say there are 3 million less occupied dwelling units no longer producing tax base revenue. No sales taxes from what is 4% of the population. Reduction of FICA payments. And the ripple effect on retail and other sectors of a 4% reduction of the economy. The disaster would be total, aside from the fact that logistically it can't be done. And the probability of disruptive things ranging from strikes to riots is huge. Wow, riots! You gonna participate, oh faux one? And yes, logistically it can be done. You're just stupid enough to fail to understand the resolve of the American people. Back to Ecuador with ya, 'Eduardo'. Support the Deport David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason Movement! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 9:55*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Deporting the non-criminal, hard working illegal immigrants will simply cause entire sectors of the economy in many regions to collapse or be paralyzed. BS - Start with huge sectors, from food processing and - harvesting to the hospitality, facilities maintenance - and sanitation industries, which would grind to a - halt without such employees... STOP THE EXPLOITATION OF ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS SEND THEM HOME Start with Liveable Wages and Improved Working Conditions Improved for Americans in those Industries. Add the decrease in taxes. Let's say there are 3 million less occupied dwelling units no longer producing tax base revenue. No sales taxes from what is 4% of the population. Reduction of FICA payments. And the ripple effect on retail and other sectors of a 4% reduction of the economy. - The disaster would be total, D'Oh Not ! - aside from the fact that logistically it can't be done. D'Oh Yes It Can ! - And the probability of disruptive things - ranging from strikes to riots is huge. d'Eduardo - You lived in South America To Long. The Vast Majority of America's Unemployed and Under-Employed are American Citizens who are High School Drop-Outs and who are : Black, Hispanic Asian and Women of All Races. THEY ALL NEED LIVING WAGE JOBS : HIRE THEM FIRST OVER ANY so-called 'Guest Worker' -ps- Most Dumbass [Drop-Out] White Boys seam to be able to Get a Job so their 'percentage is about Half to a Third of the 'other' Minority Male Drop-Outs. -note- About 3 Times the number of these Drop-Outs have a Criminal Record -versus- the Rest of the US Population -which- is another Factor in their Un-Employability. -plus- The Criminal Record Factor affects 2~3 Times the number of Minority Males than White Males. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why haven't we heard from Eduardo, the master IBOC-shill? | Shortwave | |||
Doug Myrland: man-woman IBOC-shill | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
NEW IBOC THREAD...Is Eduardo a profit? | Shortwave |