People, if you are going to answer any of the AUKk00ks, remove any mention
of any NG with the word "kook" in it. The AUKk00ks are actually harmless if
left to themselves.

"Chucky, Baby!" wrote in message
om...
Responses below:

"Teh Czar ov Awl Teh Flonkers" wrote in
message
news
I'll never know another Chucky, Baby! like Chucky, Baby! on Wed, 04 Jun
2008 10:13:56 -0500 in rec.radio.shortwave, rec.radio.amateur.policy,
alt.usenet.kooks, rec.radio.cb, or alt.2600, they're so drad:

Is this you?
personal info elided

If so, why don't you just say who you are? Also, why do you care if
someone spoofs your handle?

Hey, are you bucking for a Clueless Newbie/Coward of the Month
nomination? Because the sort of thing you did has aspects of both
cluelessness and cowardliness -- I'm inclined to think you're just
another ****ing homophobic coward of the rec.radio.* groups (they're
_legendary_ for their homophobia, cowardliness, and cluelessness), such
as the sort who've been trying to earn Mark further recognition in AUK
for years, but hey, I'm willing to be generous. Maybe you're just
clueless.

I made no mention of anything having to do with homosexuality. Calling me
homophobic is rather puzzling. It makes no sense why you would do that.
How does posting information I got in two minutes searching on google
using information I got from these posts make me a coward? Posting public
information is not an act of cowardice; it's a public service.

As for being a clueless newbie, I confess that I am new to this group,
although I have read posts in years past a few times. Thank you for the
warm welcome. Just what cluelessness are you referring to? Is there some
rule agains posting public information?

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **